1200 subscribers!!! - page 122
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This signal is problematic from the subscription point of view - Take target is 5 pips - slippage is 3-4 pips.
It is good to know that the slippage is going to be a fiasco only after the subscription.
Technically, such aspects can be detected by the Signals service - the statistics on the actual slippage is available - and if there is such a situation, the signal should be automatically unsubscribed.
For example, several days ago the provider created a new signal with 1 point takeaway and 3 subscribers already. The signal was 5 -- it is 10% down and the subscribers are not buzzing -- it is clear that these are not real subscribers or there are doubts about it.
This signal is problematic from the subscription point of view - Take target is 5 pips - slippage is 3-4 pips.
It is good to know that the slippage is going to be a fiasco only after the subscription.
Technically, such aspects can be detected by the Signals service - the statistics on the actual slippage is available - and if there is such a situation, the signal should be automatically unsubscribed.
For example, several days ago the provider created a new signal with 1 point take and 3 subscribers already. The signal was 5 -- it is 10% down and the subscribers are not buzzing -- it is clear that these are not real subscribers or there are doubts about it.
This signal is problematic from the subscription point of view - Take target is 5 pips - slippage is 3-4 pips.
It is good to know that the slippage is going to be a fiasco only after the subscription.
Technically, such aspects can be detected by the Signals service - the statistics on the actual slippage is available - and if there is such a situation, the signal should be automatically unsubscribed.
For example, several days ago the provider created a new signal with a 1-point take and 3 subscribers already. The signal was 5 -- it is 10% down and the subscribers are not buzzing -- it is clear that these are not real subscribers or there are doubts about it.
Everything in our world has accelerated. Now people are making fortunes on 1 or 2 pips. Those who don't understand this still live on daily charts.
Everything in our world has accelerated. People are now making fortunes on 1-2 pips. Those who don't understand this still live on daily charts.
That's right, you have to look for the truth on ticks.
Everything in our world has accelerated. People are now making fortunes on 1-2 pips. Those who do not understand this, they live on daily charts.
If you don't realize how fast the price moves and you pull your hair out when the price is just 15 pips away, you'll be stuck in a rut)) 2 weeks of waiting or not waiting, that's the question of manual trading and its main disadvantage
i don't know what the purpose of such volatility is
Everything in our world has accelerated. People are now making fortunes on 1-2 pips. Those who don't realise this are still living on the daily charts.
We are actually discussing the Signals service.
How, it would be interesting to know, do you imagine copying with a 1-point take?
We are actually discussing the Signals service.
How, it would be interesting to know, do you imagine copying with a 1-point take?
The red camp people's broker has its own copying service... point to point. You don't even need a terminal, you don't need a UPU. Maybe it's the not too distant future to make such a mass instant between brokers, as an alternative to the etsn. A kind of big friendly kitchen family
The people's broker from the red camp has its own copying service... point to point. You don't even need a terminal, you don't need a UPU. Maybe it's the not too distant future to make such a mass instant between brokers, as an alternative to the ecsn. A kind of big friendly kitchen family
The people's broker from the red camp has its own copying service... point to point. You don't even need a terminal, you don't need a UPU. Maybe it's the not too distant future to make such a mass instant between brokers, as an alternative to the etcn. A kind of big friendly kitchen family.
He's got all the copying going on inside his own kitchen. Sort of like it's one such PAMM. Technically it is possible to implement point to point.
How can a provider or anyone at all be held liable to subscribers/investors? In the 90s it is clear: iron on the belly. Yes and the provider should not be liable to them.
Liability should be equal to remuneration -- there is a positive trading result for the subscription time -- there is payment for the subscription -- no positive result, no payment.
I.e. the money for the subscription -- 20% goes to the MC anyway -- and 80% if there is a positive trading result goes to the provider -- if there is a negative result, it goes back to the subscriber.
Now -- when the subscribers become enough -- the provider doesn't care how long it will last -- a couple of days is enough, a couple of trades and the provider is paid from the signal.
In general, it's a perennial problem, to cut off "geniuses" who want to transfer (and are transferring) entrepreneurial risks to the employee/executor not involved in the distribution of profits.
You want the 1% cost to be 100% profit, and part of the risk to be borne by the provider, who does not participate in the profit sharing. I.e., you want to have a payment scheme for profits as in PAMM, but the amount of payment was minuscule.
Signals service is Metaquotes niche, and PAMM/MM is the niche of brokerage companies/brokers. 300$ you can take both, no one is pulling anyone anywhere - just a personal choice in accepting the conditions of payment for the result.
The responsibility of the signal provider is that he will not get future subscriptions.
The signal under discussion had been yielding super profits for half a year - it's a sufficient argument that the exploited pattern took place, i.e. everything was 1000% fair. And the fact that the pattern is primitive, well, no one bothered to find and use it on their own. The subscribers' signal began to affect the market significantly and the market was closed - this is the final result of any effort with large position volumes.
Entries for the whole $ 1-4m with 100 leverage (for example), calculate by yourself where in each entry were stop-out levels of subscribers of this signal for the whole forex, and their size. I.e. up to 1000 lots were regularly hovering on certain levels, and it is logical that they were "eaten". The number of subscribers reached $500k - don't be tempted and get out of the subscription.