1200 subscribers!!! - page 168
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I signed up for it. 4% in a couple of weeks, 1% drawdown, trades with 0.01 lot. Almost all trades are in the black, he uses averaging. I have alps.
Strange, I do not understand what is "fraudulent" performance.
It's all working now, you're seeing crooks everywhere.
It's all working now, you're seeing crooks everywhere.
It's you that's seeing things that I'm seeing... I was talking about the Arab and his luck...
It's you who's imagining things that I'm imagining... I was talking about the Arab and his luck...
Don't shoot the pianist ......
All right, did you get your subscription back?
Is that the question? I think the question is about fraud, not profitability.
he made it to the top based on history, not by actual bidding.
mcl encourages this kind of thing... after so many precedents.
I'll ask the author about the broker, I'm curious what the answer will be
There's probably already a whole ops in signals here)
With fake subscribers, with fake reviews, with fake DTs who draw history.
I think they do not touch them because they make a kopeck out of it.
Not signals but the game of who *bids* more subscribers.
I'm not the first to hear such an opinion. In my opinion, it is wrong.
If the company was focused on kopeck, it would have found a way to get the biggest part of the pie. Instead of settling for a penny.
For example, increase the commission to 70%, or charge not cheap subscriptions to signal providers.
They probably have their own idea of what is right and should be.
mcl encourages this kind of thing... after so many precedents.
I'll ask the author about the broker, I'm curious what the answer will be
Better to ask what the author changed in the EA after monitoring. Attached are three screenshots - 2 before monitoring, 1 after. My feeling is that after monitoring the frequency of trades and the duration of oversubscription have changed.
I signed up for it. 4% in a couple of weeks, 1% drawdown, trades with 0.01 lot. Almost all trades are in the black, he uses averaging. I have alps.
Strange, I do not understand what is "fraudulent" performance.