You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ahhhh... I see....
Well, where to dig and what to do?
Well, I'm not sitting idle)))
Here's the answer
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/11478
We have redesigned thetrading signalsranking system for MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Now it takes into account the quality of the signal based on its subscribers' trust. As a result, the more subscribers connect to the signal, the more trust it will have. Consequently, it will occupy a higher line in the rating. The rating will be the same for all paid and free signals.
Therefore, all our indignations are absolutely correct. The service itself misleads subscribers. It is very interesting to see how the rating is built without taking subscribers into account.
So all our indignations are absolutely correct, the service itself misleads subscribers. It is very interesting to see how the rating will be built without taking into account subscribers.
And why pull something old out of the archive. This was written in 2013. During this time this formula has changed a lot.
Here for example 2 years ago I had a signal on which my robot worked, and in 4 months hit the top 10, and now the same results, but drifts between pages 3-4, MT5.
And I think to continue this topic, there is no point.
There is another point. The person registered on January 21, wrote a review on January 23, of course positive, that is, he had two days to understand everything?
Such let's say 3-5 reviews, a new person looks and also signs up, and probably also writes a review.
The evaluation of these subscribers is not correct. Plus it's not clear if these are subscriptions from the ISP itself. Speech on the New American Capital Signal.
So you can't let new subscribers write a review right away, let them write at the end of the subscription.
There is another point. The man registered on January 21, wrote a review on January 23, of course positive, that is, he had two days to understand everything?
Such let's say 3-5 reviews, a new person looks and also signs up, and probably also writes a review.
The evaluation of these subscribers is not correct. Plus it's not clear if these are subscriptions from the ISP itself. Speech on the New American Capital Signal.
It means that they should not let new subscribers write a review at once; they should write it at the end of subscription.
There is another point. The person registered January 21, wrote a review on January 23, of course positive, that is, he had two days to understand everything?
Such let's say 3-5 reviews, a new person looks and also signs up, and probably also writes a review.
The evaluation of these subscribers is not correct. Plus it's not clear if these are subscriptions from the ISP itself. Speech on the New American Capital Signal.
It means that they should not let new subscribers write a review at once; they should write it at the end of subscription.
He has a cent account in his management. And the payment is still in full dollars?
Payment in bucks, of course.
And I asked about it, Renat answered - subscriber funds are also shown in bucks, not cents.