Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3633
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I asked if MO experts would be willing to train a grid on a process that has a strict formula, and then validate their model on new data (just a time offset t on the same formula)? It's just a formula, pure as a child's tear. And, as a bonus to self-education, you can measure any distributions of that process and compare what it was Before and what it was After.
I hope for a positive response from those willing to participate in the experiment. Otherwise, I credit the drain to the "experts" in MO. I emphasise that the formula of the process will be simple.
You seem to know that networks usually do interpolation, not extrapolation. So the problem is solvable, if you give a sample with a sufficient step to describe its values within the given limits of the function, and check the results between points, at least, and not on new limits.
However, there are now models on simple functions that create composition, but I have not used them at all. However, I think they might be good for extrapolation.
Do you have your own method for reconstructing a complex function? Tell me, I'll listen to it.
1. It's easy to check.
2. Zakr bar is not prchm. At all. In n and ns ses. But you got it.
3. What do you think if I asked you what made you think?
4. That's not required. You don't have to pick anything up.
1. What's the point of doing it?
2. My point was that I don't use regression models - I don't predict accurate performance. No experience with that.
3. I think it is harmful to think other people's thoughts :) Asking what would be interesting to know to understand what you even want to achieve with this performance.
4. Then I don't understand anything. What do you propose?
You know that networks usually deal with interpolation, not extrapolation. So the problem is solvable if you give a sample with a sufficient step to describe its values within the given limits of the function, and check on the results between the points at least, not on new limits.
However, there are now models on simple functions that create composition, but I have not used them at all. However, I think they may be good for extrapolation.
Do you have your own method for reconstructing a complex function? Tell me, I'll listen to it.
No.
I answered you in private, you did not want to accept answers.
Now I put a simple problem, with a simple formula, either someone can have the courage to predict one step ahead, or not. It's simple, the formula is known, it's simple compared to CER, right?
Why should I make light of my method? I don't owe anyone anything. Pure experimentation, science first. Experimentation is everything.
No.
I replied to you in private, you didn't want to accept replies.
Now I put a simple problem, with a simple formula, either can have the courage to predict one step ahead, or not. It's simple, the formula is known, it's simple compared to CER, isn't it?
Why should I make light of my method? I don't owe anyone anything. Pure experimentation, science first. Experimentation is everything.
So why do you and the participants need it?
So why do you and the participants need it?
For me, it is purely to laugh at the fact that elementary tasks cannot be solved by MoD specialists. And you, the experts, a challenge.
Either you're not experts, or you're just idiots. Or both. Whatever you want.
For me, it's just to laugh at the fact that elementary tasks can't be solved by MoD specialists. And to you, the experts, a challenge.
Either you're not experts, or you're just jerks. Or both. Whatever you want.
You're just looking for fun, teasing and name-calling.
To boost your self-esteem.
Well, I'm not an expert, but I thought I already answered in substance about the criteria of samples for training and testing.
It's like a joke, a tease, a name-calling....
To boost your self-esteem.
Well, I am not an expert, but I think I have already answered in essence about the criteria of samples for training and testing.
I don't want to talk about "funnies", "teases", "wants", "gnats", "optimisers", "targets", "fitness", whatever, as long as the conversation is on the point. There was a conversation here , but I didn't see a single gnat there. Or rather, I saw, but moshniki merged admitted that they are not in the subject.
To scratch one's PSV is a normal desire, healthy, especially in a fair competition. Who's dead is weak, everything is fair.
If you are not an expert, you should listen to what others say. And if you are an expert, let's race the formula, for education sake, not for fun.
There won't be any brave ones, will there? As always, only ponts and socks.
as long as the conversation is relevant
You have already demonstrated your willingness to talk about business a couple of posts ago by saying that you do not plan to share your ideas and developments.
To scratch one's ego is a normal and healthy desire, especially in a fair competition. Who died is a wimp, everything is fair.
For young males, yes. I already have some kind of pofigism ...
If you are not an expert, you need to listen to what others say. And if you are an expert, let's run the formula, for the sake of education and not for fun.
Already repeatedly asked to tell on the merits, at least about something that will be useful ...
Well, there will be no brave, right? As always, only ponts and socks.
Why guess, put out a sample, who is interested, will try their hand (or rather ready-made solutions out of the box). And I wrote about its criteria, non-compliance with them will be tantamount to falsification.
Really, I don't understand why you think everyone here is so stupid? Why the bias, negativity and some kind of aggression ...
If you want, you can find functions that are quite intricate...
1. You have already demonstrated your willingness to speak on the matter a couple of posts ago by saying that you do not intend to share your ideas and developments.
2. For young males - perhaps, yes. I already have some kind of indifference.....
3. I have already repeatedly asked you to tell me about something that will be useful.....
4. Why guess, put out a sample, who is interested, will try their hand (or rather ready-made solutions out of the box). And I wrote about its criteria, non-compliance with them will be tantamount to falsification.
5. Really, I don't understand why you think everyone here is so stupid? Why the bias, negativity and some kind of aggression...?
6. If you want to, you can find functions that are quite intricate....
1. Already shared. You have all the features and more.
2. To whom as you like, don't want as you like.
3. Gave a post above, if not useful, you will lose in the contest. If useful, you have a fighting chance.
4. Why. Combat check. Otherwise it's all water and bollocks.
5. I do not think that everyone is stupid, on the contrary, I challenge. This branch is read by hundreds of thousands of people, so the risk is high, I can lose.)))))))) Only positive, bodybuilding, health, victory over the market, all business. The main thing is not winning, the main thing is participation. All those who refused to participate - he is not confident in himself, in his methods and approaches. A weakling in general. Just do not need to say, like, here, my methods are correct but I can not participate, piss, or afraid, or not sure. Either you can and solve problems, or you can't do a thing and are a simple fuflomet. The third option is listening to the former.
6. You can, but you haven't suggested anything yet, and I can suggest it right now.
Peace be upon the world, MOU MOU, Neiru Nuiro, etc.