Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3374
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So if the data is written to a table, it becomes tabular?)
So if you put the data into a table, it becomes tabular?)
It's really about "heard a bell, don't know where it is".
100 per cent the wonders of double translation and relatively old naming conventions.
Originally, it was more about tabulated data (memorised, pre-calculated, known in advance). Tabular and tabulated are very often confused.
Initially it's about the raw data. They are either immediately tabular or never tabular :)
a table is a way of visual representation. No more than that.
and initially about nothing at all, "I remember reading or hearing somewhere".
No button to reply to a message, from a phone. Neural networks perform worse on initially tabular data. It's just a matter of getting the hang of it.
Initially tabular data:
X; Y ; H ; S ; V ;
Initially tabular data:
X; Y ; H ; S ; V ;
Initially it is a matrix of pixels, the data is not tabular but homogeneous. That's good for NS. This is where it beats bousting.
Discrete data presented as a table.
Not a T.O.?
Then I am directly lost...what is tabular/non-tabular data..... tabular is a linear metric and dependence of Y exclusively on X? then yes, it doesn't work at all, there are no such beasts in nature.
Discrete data presented in the form of a table.
Not TO ?
Then I am directly lost...what is tabular/non-tabular data..... tabular is a linear metric and dependence of Y solely on X? then yes, it doesn't work at all, there are no such beasts in nature.