You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Hi everybody, Hi Mladen,
Please Mladen, could you replace "Adaptive_Hull ema variation_Beta.mq4" in this indicator (the same above)
4bars-mtf-nlma_1.03.mq4
by your famous
nonlag_ma_nrp_amp_mtf__alerts.mq4
Because it's seem to have a "bug" with the nonlag7.1 (difference between the nonlag7.1 on the graph and on the 4TF (on the graph when the nonlag7.1 goes up sometimes, the 4TF stay down)
and another with your other famous indicator
hull_moving_average_2.0.mq4
Because I would like to compare and try different parameters (I find very useful and quicker to use the method you use with the 4TF and the indi to use (hull, nonlagma etc...) in the same place)
And Yes, I confess, I love your indicators
Thanks a lot Mladen, it will be very useful for me and probably others
Have a nice day
Zilliq
Ps: An example of the problem with the MTF nonlagma 7.1 in 15 minutes DAX. The MA goes up, but stay red, and so, in the 4TF it stays red. I haven't see this problem with your nonlagma indicator
mtf_nonlagma_v7.1.mq4
zilliq
What is the setting for filter in the example picture you attached?
Or better yet, can you post complete settings? That non lag ma can repaint in some cases, but I thought that it can do that only in marginal cases. What I would like to know where does such a big deviation come from
Juste a minute I make a copy of the parameters
Here we go...DAX ut1 TF of the nonlagma 15 minutes
I haven't see this kind of problem with your nonlagma:
Here we go...DAX ut1 TF of the nonlagma 15 minutes
I haven't see this kind of problem with your nonlagma:
Yes
That is a classical case of repainting when multi color line is used in indicator
LOL, damned repainting, Thanks for the explanation
That's why I would prefer you use your nrp code of nonlagma in this 4TF model of nlma 1.03 that I like
And could you do the same (with the 2 files), with your code of Hull 2.0 (I use both)
Thanks a lot Mladen and see you later
Zilliq
LOL, damned repainting, Thanks for the explanation
That's why I would prefer you use your nrp code of nonlagma in this 4TF model of nlma 1.03 that I like
And could you do the same (with the 2 files), with your code of Hull 2.0 (I use both)
Thanks a lot Mladen and see you later
ZilliqZilliq,
The one from this post https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/181187 is already the NonLag ma nrp version
Yes I know Mladen, but I like the model of this code nlma 1.03 with 2 files because there are others options and I know now how to change the code of this nlma 1.03 to add other options without disturb you (code arrow, multi lenth and so on...). But I didn't know how to change the code of the nlma 1.03 code to use your nolagma nrp and your hull 2.0
It would be very useful for me and others probably
Thanks a lot Mladen, and sorry for the time it needs
Zilliq
Yes I know Mladen, but I like the model of this code nlma 1.03 with 2 files because there are others options and I know now how to change the code of this nlma 1.03 to add other options without disturb you (code arrow, multi lenth and so on...). But I didn't know how to change the code of the nlma 1.03 code to use your nolagma nrp and your hull 2.0
It would be very useful for me and others probably
Thanks a lot Mladen, and sorry for the time it needs
ZilliqZilliq
Here you go You need bot indicators in the indicators folder
Thanks a lot a lot Mladen, it works perfectly as you see on my picture (I use 2 TF with 15 mn to show you the difference) (at the top the nlma and at the bottom your 4TF) and it's better than the nlma. I'm sure it will be useful for us
When you will have time could you do the same with your hull average 2.0 please, I would like to compare notably
And after that, I'm sorry I have no more idea to disturb you
Thanks for all your work you're amazing and an amazing coder
Zilliq
Thanks a lot a lot Mladen, it works perfectly as you see on my picture (I use 2 TF with 15 mn to show you the difference) (at the top the nlma and at the bottom your 4TF) and it's better than the nlma. I'm sure it will be useful for us
When you will have time could you do the same with your hull average 2.0 please, I would like to compare notably
And after that, I'm sorry I have no more idea to disturb you
Thanks for all your work you're amazing and an amazing coder
ZilliqZilliq
This is the one using Hull moving average 2 for calculation