O provedor não segue suas próprias regras, como "Número máximo de ordens em uma série: 7", o que compromete sua confiabilidade. Sua arrogância e soberba são elevadas, e ele não aceita críticas dos usuários, chegando a expô-los em seu canal do Telegram, aliás, o que deve acontecer comigo também. ;-)
Atualmente, o DD está em 50% (12-jul-2024 16h00 GBPUSD em 1.29700), e mesmo assim, o provedor continua a criar ordens contra a tendência. Neste momento são 12 operações de venda. Analisando os indicadores, eu só abriria ordem de venda abaixo de 1.29100.
Os retornos deste sinal são incontestáveis ao logo dos últimos 20 meses, mas momentos como este revelam o verdadeiro equilíbrio e habilidade do provedor de sinais.
O maior problema que enfrentamos é que, caso o sinal quebre, o provedor pode simplesmente apagá-lo, impossibilitando a análise posterior. É lamentável que a plataforma mql5 permita que provedores de sinais façam isso.
Minha recomendação? Desative o Sinal na configuração do MT5 para evitar mais ordens contra a tendência e opere manualmente para tentar salvar suas contas.
************
Atualização: 12-jul-2024 18h30
Elvira acaba de postar em seu canal no Telegram esse texto:
"The most important thing is to quickly leave negative feedback on my signal. The more often you leave, the more you make me angry and expose your accounts to danger."
Entenda Elvira não é pessoal e, por isso, não fique brava. Você como trader profissional não deve deixar o emocial te contaminar. Esses feedbacks são importantes e necessários para evoluir e não destruir. Por favor, fique calma e faça o seu melhor, como comprovadamente você fez ao longo desde últimos 20 meses neste sinal e anos em sua carreira. No seu sinal, tem muito capital e confiamos em você para fazer uma boa gestão. Não cometa erros pelo emocial, siga sua estratégia, mas não deixe de ver todos os comentários.
The vast majority of signals here have poor risk management, and this one is no exception. I'm glad I had my own stop loss set at 25%, which is still no joke. I'm out of MQL5 copytrading. I've tried several signals, and my conclusion is that this is, with a few exceptions, gambling.
The signal is operating out of descriptions, open a lot of operations to try recovery. she need come back to basic operations. Now is very dangerous with many positions.
This ''trader'' operates against strong trends, and certainly does not close positions for fear of tarnishing the high win rate, like other comments below, it also goes against the description of the signal itself, bad risk-reward. I do not recommend.
Of course, when all is going well, there are no complaints. I do join the message of Andrew. Good trading is not only about a high win rate. It is about reward to risk. Taking 5 pips on a risk of a drawdown of tens if not hundred pips is something real traders will never allow. Yes, I have been following the signal due to its popularity, but have not actively been copying for a while now because of the above reasons. Chances are still there to get out, but it is the management of the trades and risks that is totally absent. Emotional behavior is not professional, that’s why you will not find me on the Telegram group anymore either. Developed my own system in the mean time and running with my own strict rules – and successful. All the best.
We terminated the signal for 3 reasons; first trader indicates his objectives is to be right (i.e. high win rate), not wrong in trading. Trading is about risk and reward, not right and wrong, though it figures in, second, trader violated his own rules by taking on 9 positions, 2 more than his stated maximum (see Description tab), and lastly trader gets angry at customers. Emotion and trading don't mix well. Having said all that trader has a truly remarkable record at picking winners, not losers. So congrats for this. We invest for risk vs. reward. All the best! :)
im a subscriber for several month and was really happy how he managed. With the long time buy order open the mess started. So why yesterday instead of closing the 1 sell instead of moving the TP 250 points away. Tomorrow is GDP and indication right now is buy. So i not get this and i hope you are aware of it even your DD is gaining. Please get back to your original behavior and Money Management
Can be short about it, started 11 June to try , only lose. , ofcourse i know that can happen, but the positions/direction which are held are too risky and i my opinion not very active to make profit. For more then a week only holding short positions on a simple TA graph..with overbought , avoiding that the trend is up for now. It would be better to hedge while this trend stays on to make any profit while holding shorts. Sorry till now not satisfied and lost money
O provedor não segue suas próprias regras, como "Número máximo de ordens em uma série: 7", o que compromete sua confiabilidade. Sua arrogância e soberba são elevadas, e ele não aceita críticas dos usuários, chegando a expô-los em seu canal do Telegram, aliás, o que deve acontecer comigo também. ;-)
Atualmente, o DD está em 50% (12-jul-2024 16h00 GBPUSD em 1.29700), e mesmo assim, o provedor continua a criar ordens contra a tendência. Neste momento são 12 operações de venda. Analisando os indicadores, eu só abriria ordem de venda abaixo de 1.29100.
Os retornos deste sinal são incontestáveis ao logo dos últimos 20 meses, mas momentos como este revelam o verdadeiro equilíbrio e habilidade do provedor de sinais.
O maior problema que enfrentamos é que, caso o sinal quebre, o provedor pode simplesmente apagá-lo, impossibilitando a análise posterior. É lamentável que a plataforma mql5 permita que provedores de sinais façam isso.
Minha recomendação? Desative o Sinal na configuração do MT5 para evitar mais ordens contra a tendência e opere manualmente para tentar salvar suas contas.
************
Atualização: 12-jul-2024 18h30
Elvira acaba de postar em seu canal no Telegram esse texto:
"The most important thing is to quickly leave negative feedback on my signal. The more often you leave, the more you make me angry and expose your accounts to danger."
Entenda Elvira não é pessoal e, por isso, não fique brava. Você como trader profissional não deve deixar o emocial te contaminar. Esses feedbacks são importantes e necessários para evoluir e não destruir. Por favor, fique calma e faça o seu melhor, como comprovadamente você fez ao longo desde últimos 20 meses neste sinal e anos em sua carreira. No seu sinal, tem muito capital e confiamos em você para fazer uma boa gestão. Não cometa erros pelo emocial, siga sua estratégia, mas não deixe de ver todos os comentários.
I absolutely do not recommend it. trading against the trend, without SL. profit and risks are not correlated.
The vast majority of signals here have poor risk management, and this one is no exception. I'm glad I had my own stop loss set at 25%, which is still no joke. I'm out of MQL5 copytrading. I've tried several signals, and my conclusion is that this is, with a few exceptions, gambling.
The signal is operating out of descriptions, open a lot of operations to try recovery. she need come back to basic operations. Now is very dangerous with many positions.
This ''trader'' operates against strong trends, and certainly does not close positions for fear of tarnishing the high win rate, like other comments below, it also goes against the description of the signal itself, bad risk-reward. I do not recommend.
smalls wins, massive drawdowns
Of course, when all is going well, there are no complaints. I do join the message of Andrew. Good trading is not only about a high win rate. It is about reward to risk. Taking 5 pips on a risk of a drawdown of tens if not hundred pips is something real traders will never allow. Yes, I have been following the signal due to its popularity, but have not actively been copying for a while now because of the above reasons. Chances are still there to get out, but it is the management of the trades and risks that is totally absent. Emotional behavior is not professional, that’s why you will not find me on the Telegram group anymore either. Developed my own system in the mean time and running with my own strict rules – and successful. All the best.
We terminated the signal for 3 reasons; first trader indicates his objectives is to be right (i.e. high win rate), not wrong in trading. Trading is about risk and reward, not right and wrong, though it figures in, second, trader violated his own rules by taking on 9 positions, 2 more than his stated maximum (see Description tab), and lastly trader gets angry at customers. Emotion and trading don't mix well. Having said all that trader has a truly remarkable record at picking winners, not losers. So congrats for this. We invest for risk vs. reward. All the best! :)
im a subscriber for several month and was really happy how he managed. With the long time buy order open the mess started. So why yesterday instead of closing the 1 sell instead of moving the TP 250 points away. Tomorrow is GDP and indication right now is buy. So i not get this and i hope you are aware of it even your DD is gaining. Please get back to your original behavior and Money Management
Can be short about it, started 11 June to try , only lose. , ofcourse i know that can happen, but the positions/direction which are held are too risky and i my opinion not very active to make profit. For more then a week only holding short positions on a simple TA graph..with overbought , avoiding that the trend is up for now. It would be better to hedge while this trend stays on to make any profit while holding shorts. Sorry till now not satisfied and lost money