Sydney MT5

After the extensive test of the author's EAs, I now submit my final recession. In the beginning, all EA's performed well, it wasn't traded often, but then with good success. Unfortunately, it has happened so far on all EA's, Sydney and Rome, that the trading account had a total loss. This is partly due to the recovery mode, which is just a grid system, and partly because the EA simply chooses the wrong entry in rare cases. This has also been seen very well in the programmer's signals. Thus, all profits that were built up in places over weeks and months were wiped out with just one trade. In the long run I can therefore not in good conscience recommend these EAs, be it SYDNEY or ROME. Even with the very promising back tests and the signals, this strategy remains very questionable and will not lead to the desired success in the long term. I bought the EA's and tested them on small accounts as well. Each of these accounts went into total loss over time. Even without the recovery mode, the strategy will lead to a loss over time, since it takes 13 to 20 trades that have to be closed in profit to compensate for the loss. However, it turns out that the EA, no matter which one, does not create it. What I personally find very outrageous, it should be mentioned here, is that the author immediately deletes the live signal in the event of a large loss. This completely destroys trust in the author and the EA. You do not do something like that. In addition, I unfortunately have to say that quite a few bad EA's have been offered here on MQL5 lately. Finding a good one takes a lot of time and nerves. Please keep your eyes open and see exactly what you are getting for an EA.

Negative review. Very rarely trades and then a big loss despite the Recovery mode option being turned on.

After the extensive test of the author's EAs, I now submit my final recession. In the beginning, all EA's performed well, it wasn't traded often, but then with good success. Unfortunately, it has happened so far on all EA's, Rio, Sydney and Rome, that the trading account had a total loss. This is partly due to the recovery mode, which is just a grid system, and partly because the EA simply chooses the wrong entry in rare cases. This has also been seen very well in the programmer's signals. Thus, all profits that were built up in places over weeks and months were wiped out with just one trade. In the long run I can therefore not in good conscience recommend these EAs, be it RIO, SYDNEY or ROME. Even with the very promising back tests and the signals, this strategy remains very questionable and will not lead to the desired success in the long term. I bought the EA's and tested them on small accounts as well. Each of these accounts went into total loss over time. Even without the recovery mode, the strategy will lead to a loss over time, since it takes 13 to 20 trades that have to be closed in profit to compensate for the loss. However, it turns out that the EA, no matter which one, does not create it. What I personally find very outrageous, it should be mentioned here, is that the author immediately deletes the live signal in the event of a large loss. This completely destroys trust in the author and the EA. You do not do something like that. In addition, I unfortunately have to say that quite a few bad EA's have been offered here on MQL5 lately. Finding a good one takes a lot of time and nerves. Please keep your eyes open and see exactly what you are getting for an EA.

I have been using this EA for more than a month, it doesn’t trade a lot, but when it does, it will always give me profit. Ruben is very responsive to questions and will provide answers promptly. Top product and top seller!

After the extensive test of the author's EAs, I now submit my final recession. In the beginning, all EA's performed well, it wasn't traded often, but then with good success. Unfortunately, it has happened so far on all EA's, Sydney and Rome, that the trading account had a total loss. This is partly due to the recovery mode, which is just a grid system, and partly because the EA simply chooses the wrong entry in rare cases. This has also been seen very well in the programmer's signals. Thus, all profits that were built up in places over weeks and months were wiped out with just one trade. In the long run I can therefore not in good conscience recommend these EAs, be it SYDNEY or ROME. Even with the very promising back tests and the signals, this strategy remains very questionable and will not lead to the desired success in the long term. I bought the EA's and tested them on small accounts as well. Each of these accounts went into total loss over time. Even without the recovery mode, the strategy will lead to a loss over time, since it takes 13 to 20 trades that have to be closed in profit to compensate for the loss. However, it turns out that the EA, no matter which one, does not create it. What I personally find very outrageous, it should be mentioned here, is that the author immediately deletes the live signal in the event of a large loss. This completely destroys trust in the author and the EA. You do not do something like that. In addition, I unfortunately have to say that quite a few bad EA's have been offered here on MQL5 lately. Finding a good one takes a lot of time and nerves. Please keep your eyes open and see exactly what you are getting for an EA.

2 weeks and only 2 trades and they where 2 losses . not good ea at all more money waisted this ea needs fixing . and some reviews are just bull shit lies !!

UNA ESTAFA DE ASESOR EXPERTO SOLICITO REEMBOLSO POR LA COMPRA

13% profit in one week I am giving 5 stars right now. I'll vote again for the future.

4 to 6 USD profit and 110 USD Loss, very Less signal, after one month of profit i get a stop loss of 110 USD, All profit becomes Zero in one trade. Risk: Reward= 1:20

I purchased the EA after reading good reviews and testing it. Now I'm sure that this EA doesn't use any artificial intelligence (AI). It's just an icon and some text in the description. Take Profit is at 6 pips and is acting as a Trailing Stop, but Stop Loss at 69 pips is just ''crazy'' huge SL. Today, the robot closed some losing positions. He uses a Grid strategy, and max as 100 lots scares me a lot because there may come a time when EA starts adding positions to make up for lost positions, and it could reach 100.00 lots and wipe out my account. It's very dangerous. I will update the information from time to time, but for now I am very unhappy because it is not AI but a regular grid that has added more lots after losing positions, SL that doesn't translate into risk management, and I don't see any profitable positions, only losing ones. I wanted to try your Rio MT5 too, but I'm pretty sure that is not AI, no thanks. you also mentioned that if I added an review, you would receive Price Indicator DNA for free, so I am not surprised by the positive review you have added, and you also send clients to the broker via your ''referral links'' you mentioned me on private message when i asked for settings and with these i assuming you earn commission from recommended clients..

Looks promising

Good EA!

I made a comparison and the backtests published by the author are authentic, plus the operations performed in the published signal are the same as in the backtests, it gives me hope! today I start it live with a slightly lower risk than the standard. the author available and ready to help... i share MYFXBOOK SIGNAL: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/MarcoMonceri/sydney-12/10134660

as good as rio mt5

I recommend. Great precision and good positions.

Back tests look good. Running on Sim now. Need tight spreads to make it work.

Another profitable and good EA from the author, excellent support.

I recommend