AI TradingVision GPX

Trading with TradingVisionGPX has been profitable from the start. September was a bad month, I assume, due to the US elections (which my other EAs also experienced in backtesting), and Christmas/New Year was also choppy. Lesson learned: Do not be in the market during times of high uncertainty or low trading numbers. It is too volatile, and no EA can predict what will happen in those times. The latest version 3.0 of TradngVision is better. I now have the latest AI TrendBooster EA (bought 09JAN2025), and live demo trading corresponds with the backtesting, which is excellent. I expect to go live with actual money in a couple of weeks after demo testing, as I expect the combination of the two will offset any downturns. The customer support from Yu Mei Cheng has been excellent, with clear and timely communication in the MQL5 chat. They also responded to earlier programming problems such as recognising retail pair codes with suffixes and a problem with non-USD currency. I have no problem recommending these products and the author.

Ver2.8 was not going in a very good direction, but after reverting to Ver2.7, it is stable with no particular loss. Now. So, I will continue the operation as it is, just to see how it goes.

Perfect results in backtesting. Big losses in LIVE. DO NOT BUY. The creator just updates the data for backtesting so it looks profitable, but it has zero chance to work in live. It's a scam, sad to see. Lost a lot of money over 10 months of live testing.

GREAT SCAM with LIVE and DEMO accounts testing over 4 Months ! LOSS !

Firstly, I want to thank you and your team for creating such a great EA. Over the last year I coded 30 EA's and tested 50 or more from the market. The best was break even. But AI Trading Vision is an animal! It doubles your account every 2 months! I have hopes to be a millionaire in less than 3 years, by adding funds to my forex when I can and not taking profits until my account is over $300,000, then I can retire on $100,000/month. I bought this EA last month, Started with a $2,000 account on September 9th. As of this writing October 5th now $3,034 it has made $1,034 profit, 14 winning trades in a row. I have it set on 0.03% and risk mode so my lot sizes automatically grow, and even at a 2,400 point draw down I still have 105% equity in Forex, so not blowing the account. In back testing these extreme trades happen 3 to 4 times a year, but with 97% wins and only 3% loss this is more than acceptable in my opinion. Now I must say it does enter trades sometimes "backwards" to the trend, goes into 700 to 1,000 points draw down but just be patient, they all turned out a win in 3 to 5 days. I am very happy with this EA, I hope you stay with this and provide updates as needed.

I purchased this EA when it was first released, being one of its earliest users. I can say that in my nearly 20 years of forex trading experience, this is the EA I'm most satisfied with. It truly achieves safety and controllability, requiring only simple adjustments to the risk value. Its strategy should be traditional swing trading but not simply buying high and selling low. Many times, it's even more accurate than me, a trader who considers himself experienced, which might be the power of AI that has learned from decades of trading data—it's hard not to be convinced.

--

I'm usually the type to make money quietly, but this time I'm speaking up mainly to say a fair word for the author. I've always been very satisfied with this EA's performance. However, some friends may lack sufficient experience and, just because it performs poorly under certain market conditions, they dismiss an EA suitable for long-term trading. This only leads to bad money driving out good. Some may have used it for a relatively short time, even less than a month. They don't realize that Buffett's annual capital growth is on average about 20%, achieved through long-term compound interest, which is exponential growth. This is exactly why I praise this EA. Many people only see the drawdowns, but I see the capabilities of this EA.

--

It doesn't scalp during low-liquidity early sessions, nor does it rush in during breakouts to grab the initiative. Experienced traders know these simple rules—why do few people get rich from them, and large funds don't use these strategies? It's simple: because they're too simple. Everyone knows them and trades in the same direction, leading to a lack of counterparties and causing huge slippage. Even though the forex market has daily trading volumes of trillions of dollars, funds are dispersed among various brokers, and more funds circulate between banks. Therefore, relying on these simple rules cannot make you rich. Don't be fooled by backtests showing profits of thousands or tens of thousands of times; when trading large lots in reality, slippage during these times can be significant. I've experienced slippage of several hundred points. In fact, all EAs that aim for profits with large lot sizes and small pip gains cannot avoid slippage. This isn't brokers deliberately causing trouble; it's partly due to slight discrepancies in server data among different brokers.

However, this EA is different. It doesn't need to place orders during these times but even places orders in advance, cleverly staggering orders at different price levels and times, sometimes even in the opposite direction. This makes it possible to trade large funds with large lot sizes, equivalent to pre-positioning of funds. I have to say, the author is certainly experienced.

--

Regarding drawdowns, anyone who has done manual trading knows how difficult it is. Few can persist in manual trading for a year without ultimately incurring losses. This is because the market is constantly changing, and many people only trade using recent market patterns, which is not comprehensive. When patterns change, most people will incur losses. Many people become desperate with their own trading and then pin their hopes on EA trading. With the development of AI, I believe this is a trend. Human traders will find it difficult to outperform AI.

--

I hope the author can continue to improve this EA and not pay attention to those negative reviews. They don't even know that large funds can use the "Safety First" mode and "Custom Interval" mode, underestimating the effort you've put into your clever design and improvements. A price of $1,000 is too low compared to the opportunity to make big money. Even if it ultimately fails, it's just a normal cost paid for an investment opportunity, small enough to ignore. It's very worthwhile. So, author, please continue to make improvements; you do not lack rational supporters.

However, for friends with larger funds, don't let my views influence your judgment. After all, this is a technology that hasn't been verified over a long period and may fail. Using a smaller risk value and trading slowly is the safest approach. This EA's risk value can be set almost infinitesimally small, achieving near-zero-risk testing.

Said a lot, this might be what is meant by the saying that silent people either do not speak or erupt when they do. I am curious to know to what extent this EA can eventually be improved.

//

Update: Some friends mentioned the inconsistency between backtesting and real trading results. This is addressed in the author's FAQ. The reason is quite simple: unless an EA has no changes, any adjustment of parameters or addition of strategies will lead to different backtesting results. In fact, this is proof that the author is genuinely improving the strategy, which is fundamentally different from those EAs that merely eliminate negative trades. The EA's update log shows detailed improvements, and the author meticulously records and honestly displays the EA's real trading performance. I wonder if those people truly understand trading. It's rare to see an EA that continues to be seriously improved after being sold, showing that the author cares about everyone's opinions.

However, I'd like to say that this might not be a good thing. Overly concerning yourself with opinions from those less technically proficient than you might hinder your thinking and creativity. Don't expect to create a truly perfect EA that satisfies everyone. You need to realize that no one would be foolish enough to sell a truly near-perfect EA. Investing in an early purchase is a good choice; don't miss the opportunity.

ANOTHER BAD EXPERT

Hello, I don't understand the positive reviews at all. My account is being systematically kilned.

Пользователь не оставил комментарий к оценке

UPDATE: No matter how many fake and long reviews the creators of this EA posted after my initial, their Signal, which is the main indicator of how well this EA works, continues being a disaster. Do not fall into the traps of long and fake reviews. Just protect your money and avoid this scam.

My Experience After 10 Months Using This EA: I was one of the first buyers in November 2023. I lost A LOT of money, even with moderate settings. It is my moral duty to warn everyone about this EA. Performance: There are definitely two EAs: the one that the backtest shows, and the one that performs with real money. Unfortunately, for the buyers of this EA, a sub-par version is what’s available. The backtest will show you that you’ll become a millionaire in a couple of months. The reality is different. The EA in real mode is unreliable: it closes losers before recovery when the trend is reversing, and it closes winners only to enter trades in the opposite direction. Long story short, it’s a real mess in terms of entry and exit points, nothing like the backtesting in ANY parameter. For example, in most backtests, the average holding time is close to one day or 24 hours, with a maximum of 5.5 days. In real trading, the EA holds losing trades for more than a week. Backtest deletion of bad results: After a disastrous month, usually at the beginning of the month, an update appears to magically correct the backtest results of the previous month. This destroys trust in the creators of this EA. Customer Service: The most infuriating aspect of all this is the attitude of the administrators of this EA: "Don't worry too much." "In the long term, this strategy works." I'm sure many users have heard this. "Don't dwell on this." Meanwhile, the EA loses money, while customer service tries to calm you down and keep the EA running. Customer Service usually blames the news, calling them "unforeseeable events" that affect market trends and cause poor performance. They repeat this all over the web as an excuse for the EA's failure to generate consistent profits. There were news events during the backtesting period, and there will continue to be news in the future. This is not a valid reason for such disastrous performance. For many months I was warning them that something feels wrong, the EA behaves strange, it is not consistent, it is slow, doesn't close on time, doesn't open in obvious supports, etc... and they continued pushing that everything is well and "don't worry too much." "Manage your risk" There it is. There's absolutely nothing they can write under this review that will change the reality: this EA doesn't work. Period. And people should know this, until further notice. Note on 09.13.2024: I am willing to edit this review if the creators can prove, with a real account and real data, that this EA is profitable. There's the Signal, whose profits of 5 months were destroyed in GBP/USD. The 09.12.2024 reversal was a textbook reversal, and we see that the EA is losing all of its profits. Again.

Пользователь не оставил комментарий к оценке

This EA is absolute rubbish, it just slowly loses money, I cant understand how anyone can leave a good review (only if they are fake reviews), even the Author does not have faith in their own EA and only have a $500USD Live account... so that says it all really. Also there are constant updates which again indicates they have no strategy that works. My advice is dont waste your money, like I did, on them or this useless EA. The losses are much bigger than any wins and slowly your account will depreciate.

At the beginning of the year, the EA was still profitable and after that there were several heavy losses. After each heavy loss, there was a patch in which the losses were cleaned up in the backtest. So far, the situation has not been able to improve. Trading was done with GBPUSD

Don't buy it!!!!! Don't buy it!!!!! Don't buy it!!!!! This EA is Rubbish!!!!Not same with back testing!! It will make you lost money!!Don't buy it!!!!!

Пользователь не оставил комментарий к оценке

这个EA怎么说呢，开始用它确实有赚钱。但是它也给我的账户亏损了一半的资产。所以给个一半的分吧

What can I say about this EA? It is indeed profitable to start using it. But it also cost my account half of its assets. So give it half a score.

Для меня это один из ХУДШИХ EA на данный момент, Я очень НЕВЗЛЮБИЛ этот советник. Это ХУДШЕЕ что я пробывал Я пользуюсь этим советником уже более около 8 месяцев, НЕторгует и НЕзащищает ваши средства. Не советник а просто КИДАЛАВО!

Been running this on a live account since December 23, 2023, and even with a couple down weeks with my VPS, this algo has managed a 168% return over 7 months. Excellent, stable performance

Top EA, Very satisfied with the purchase

I have been using this EA by on a live account for 5 months now. This is a decent amount of time to make a judgement. And I can say I am very satisfied. The EA is very profitable and the drawdowns are small. Thank you to Yu Mei Cheng and his team. I can't wait for their next EA getting published.