작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
311
34%
중재
61
36%
/
39%
기한 초과
100
32%
로드됨
5
등급
프로젝트
473
40%
중재
103
41%
/
23%
기한 초과
78
16%
바쁜
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
Here is an example of Requirements Specification for the development of the MACD Sample Expert Advisor, which is available in the MetaTrader 5 standard package. 1. The idea of the trading system is as follows: market entries are performed when MACD's main and signal lines intersect in the current trend direction. 2. Trend is determined based on the Exponential Moving Average with the specified period
I am looking for a pre-built MetaTrader 5 (MT5) Expert Advisor (EA) that can fully automate trading on major currency pairs such as EURUSD, AUDUSD, EURCAD, and USDCAD. Requirements: Fully automated trading (no manual intervention required) Compatible with MT5 platform Designed for consistent, long-term performance Demonstrated average monthly return of at least 3% Verified backtest and/or live trading results showing
Project Title Freedom ORB – Fully Automated MT5 Expert Advisor (ORB + Structure + Liquidity) (MT5) Project Description I require a fully automated MT5 Expert Advisor based on a structured Opening Range Breakout (ORB) model with market structure and liquidity confirmation. The EA must: Detect ORB session range Wait for breakout (close-based) Wait for retrace Confirm M1 structure + displacement Execute trade
Hello, I am a serious buyer looking to acquire an existing, stable, and profitable Expert Advisor (EA) designed specifically for: 👉 primarily (XAUUSD) or any fx This is a full buyout request, ⚠️ I am NOT looking to build a new EA from scratch. Only ready-made, proven systems with real performance history. ✅ EA Requirements (Strict) 📌 Symbol & Strategy ✔️ Trades Gold only (XAUUSD) ✔️ Price Action logic preferred
Gold - Quick Scalper EA with TP, SL
30 - 40 USD
I’m looking for a trading bot where I can use a balance of £1000 to make regular entries making £20-£40 per entry. obviously, I want to have minimum loss with a lot more profit being made
I want an mt5 advisor which use advanced strategies like Accumulation, manipulate, distribution plus ABC pattern Recognition , Smart filters, Rsi + Ema crossovers, Hidden SL, partialTPs and dynamic lot sizing , works on Forex and crypto fully automated no expiry
Gold robot for 1 minute
100 - 150 USD
I need a EA as per the attached video. I need the same type of EA, once it is ready share the video of any demo account. if everything is ok I will purchase immediately. thank you
I’m hiring an experienced MQL5 developer to finish and fix an existing project (NOT building from scratch). I have: An existing MT5 EA (.mq5 + .ex5) that is based on my TradingView logic A TradingView indicator version used for signals/alerts The EA works but has logic/consistency issues and needs improvements + cleanup Goal Make the EA reliable and consistent: Ensure entries/exits match the intended logic Fix
It is better to spend thirty minutes to prepare a good text than to lose hours and days to resolve misunderstanding after concluding the Agreement or when accepting the order execution results
. Estou buscando adquirir um Expert Advisor (EA) existente e com fins lucrativos, com código-fonte completo, para adicionar ao portfólio de investimentos de nossos clientes. Para deixar claro, esta não é uma solicitação para desenvolver ou projetar uma nova estratégia. Se você já possui um EA comprovado, consistente e pronto para produção, com pelo menos 6 meses de histórico de desempenho, estou disposto a analisá-lo
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD