작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
314
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
100
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
477
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
81
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
I'm looking to connect with an experienced MT5 developer who has previously built or worked on advanced trade copier systems beyond standard master-slave copying. Requirements: • Strong MT5 and MQL5 experience • Experience developing trade copiers • Familiarity with manual trade replication concepts • Knowledge of MT5 terminal architecture and execution workflows • Experience integrating MT5 with external
Asian trade session filter program
30 - 60 USD
Hello, I have two Expert Advisors (EAs) that I'm migrating to my MQL5 VPS. I need a program that I can run on a separate chart or other interface to: - Allow EA #2 (with the magic number) to trade only during the Asian session. Therefore, EA #2 needs to be blocked during all other sessions. - Allow EA #1 to trade without restriction. Thank you
Labouchere System has many series and can transfer the Units to any other Series when needed (this function is very important). Building a dedicated SeriesManager class to handle all eight arrays would be very useful to make the unit transfers "atomic," so the logic is bulletproof and we never have to worry about data errors during the series transitions. The coders who really knows this cancellation sytem can apply
Project Overview I need an MQL5 developer to review and confirm their understanding of this project before providing a quote. Objective: Backtest an Opening Range Breakout (ORB) strategy on NAS100USD and generate detailed trade documentation. Requirements: Instrument NAS100USD only. Backtesting Run the ORB strategy on historical data. Target a minimum of 200 trades if the available data allows. Advise how much
Developers needed for mt4, mt5 EAs
45 - 50 USD
Looking to buy profitable MT4/MT5 Expert Advisors (EAs). Requirements: • Fully automated • 6+ months backtest • 100+ trades • No martingale or grid systems Send: • Backtest report • Max drawdown • Markets traded • Brief strategy summary Only original EAs developed by you. Long-term collaboration available
Hi, We are an experienced team of quants with products top ranked in MQL5 but who needs to gain audience on 10K+ communities to advertise EA to get more traffic on mql5. Thanks
We are looking to purchase Expert Advisors (EAs) for MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Requirements: -Minimum 6 months of history (12+ months preferred). -Forex pairs, Gold (XAUUSD), Indices, Commodities, or Crypto CFDs are all acceptable. -Fully automated. -No martingale. -No grid systems. -No lot multiplication or position size scaling based on previous wins or losses. -Not dependent on extremely low spreads/slippage
DESCRIPTION: I require an experienced MQL5 developer to build a fully automated, multi‑engine, multi‑asset trend‑following trading system for MetaTrader 5. The system includes: Multiple TrendEngine instances (one per symbol) A PortfolioController that manages all engines Volatility‑regime detection Dual‑timeframe confirmation ATR‑based breakout logic ATR‑based stop management Micropyramiding Risk‑weighted satellites
Description: I need a semi-automatic Expert Advisor (EA) developed for MetaTrader 5 (Hedging account, optimized for Exness Cent accounts) to manage my manual trades on Gold (XAUUSD) using a positive pyramiding trend-following strategy. Detailed Specifications: 1. Multi-Basket Management (Crucial): The EA does NOT open the initial trade. It waits for me to open a manual trade (Buy or Sell). If I open another manual
Live chart [ expert is not executing trades on xauusd ] , Deleting Existing Parameter not in use , Live Chart Adjustments Only , No Need to Change anything else , expert will be live testing Throughout
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD