작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
314
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
100
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
477
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
81
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
Hello, I am searching profitable, 0/1 rules strategy. Only serious offers please, I am expecting longer co-operation, I am open for your propositions, ideas. Have a nice day! I hope I will find here honest person
Need an Expert Advisor designed specifically for XAUUSD (Gold) , based on liquidity sweep + breakout confirmation logic. Market Focus Instrument: XAUUSD only Optimized for high volatility and intraday expansion behavior typical for Gold. Strategy Concept The EA is based on liquidity sweep of previous day levels followed by market structure shift and continuation in the confirmed direction. Daily Levels Previous Day
2STEP MA WITH SUPERTREND+
30+ USD
Can we do this 2 Indicatos at once NOTES 1. Step MA are on HTF, So values to be used are for Time frame that have closed 2. Pairs that are to be displayed for 2 STEP MA TREND DISPLAY are to be arranged in alphabetical order 3. Pairs in Bullish Weak trend are to be displayed in Green 4. Pairs in Bearish Weak Trend are to be displayed in Red 5. Position for displayed to be adjustable
GoldTrade EA
50 - 100 USD
Evening. I need a programme who will be patient with my EA specifications as it consists of +/- 30 sections ..but before we can start I want us to agree on these terms ...are as follows...the programmer should follow these order .[.Market regiom > trend bias > Lequidity > Smc > Momentum > Session > Risk > Entry > Exit ] and also should help me with these prototype request phase 1=Logicframework . phase 2=Entry engine
EA for deriv Broker
33+ USD
Hello everyone, I am looking for a profitable Expert Advisor (EA) that has already been developed and tested for use on the Deriv platform, particularly for Boom, Crash, Volatility Indices, Step Indices, and other synthetic indices offered by Deriv. I am interested in EAs with proven performance and verifiable results. If you have an EA that is already built and operational, I would be happy to discuss its strategy
Professional AI Automation Trading Bot for Forex & Crypto
500 - 1500 USD
Title Professional AI Automation Trading Bot for Forex & Crypto Solution Language Python (preferred) or MQL5 depending on integration requirements. Categories Expert Advisor (EA) for MetaTrader 5 Automated trading strategies AI/ML-based signal generation Risk management automation Required Skills Strong knowledge of MQL5/Python Experience with MetaTrader API integration Machine learning model deployment
Hello, I am looking for an experienced developer to build a fully automated Python-based MT5 trading bot. The strategy is based on Smart Money Concepts (SMC) and includes multi-timeframe analysis, automated trade execution, risk management, and backtesting. Requirements: Python and MetaTrader 5 integration SMC strategy implementation Automated trade execution Risk management (SL, TP, position sizing) Backtesting and
O EA deve operar - na corretora BINANCE - com duas médias móveis que podem ser aritmética, exponencial, ponderada, alma( Alnaud Legoux ), Jurik. O EA fica comprado quando a primeira média (rápida) cruzar a segunda média ( lenta ) para cima e vendido quando a primeira média cruzar a segunda média para baixo. Cada entrada deve ser zerada por stop loss, stop gain ou na virada de mão
BullyMax Pro
30+ USD
"Act as an expert MQL5 algorithmic trading developer. I want you to create a profitable and efficient Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 5. Do not write the code yet; read the following trading rules, analyze them, and ask me any clarifying questions if needed. Timeframe: [e.g.15 minutes Chart] Entry Logic: [e.g.MACD + RSI + REVERSAL PRICE ACTION. Enter buy when Macd line crosses above the signal line ,RSI above 30 and
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to build and optimize an Expert Advisor for MT5. Requirements: 1. The EA must be capable of passing prop firm challenges: - Profit target: 8-10% - Max daily drawdown: 4-5% - Max total drawdown: 8-10% - No martingale, no grid - News filter included 2. The EA must manage funded accounts long term with consistent monthly returns. 3. The EA must run on VPS
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD