작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
316
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
102
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
I need a robust optimization of my MT5 EA, mainly for XAUUSD (Gold). Please optimize the existing adjustable parameters such as entry/exit settings, SL/TP, trailing/break-even settings, and any other strategy parameters that are appropriate. I want the optimization focused on stable profitability, low/moderate drawdown, and robustness rather than simply the highest possible profit. Please use out-of-sample testing
Gann_Reversal_Confluence_V4
30 - 50 USD
I want someone to check if the indicator is re-painting or drawing and modify it. When I refresh the chart sometimes it the buy and sell arrow change positions. I want the indicator draw and dot re-paint
NinjaTrader 8 / NinjaScript Phase 1 build: convert an existing Auction Market Theory (AMT) strategy into objective, alert-only decision-support logic. Not a bot, no auto-execution — trades stay manual. Covers NQ/MNQ, ES, CL, MGC using 30-min TPO/Volume Profile context with 5-min confirmation: one 5-min close outside VAH/VAL = acceptance, close back inside = rejection. Dashboard shows bias, auction state, location
Hello, I need a custom NON-REPAINT MT5 indicator that gives sell/buy arrow signals 1–2 candlesticks before a spike on Crash and boom indices respectively occurs. Requirements: Works perfectly on MT5 Shows arrows before the spike (1–2 candles earlier). Non-repaint – once the arrow appears, it must stay. Should be accurate, not quantity — only quality signals. Must work on both demo and live accounts. I want the
Trading view to thinkorswim
30+ USD
Hello, I saw an indicator on TradingView and would like to know if you will be able to convert it for use on Thinkorswim platform? Thanks. if anyone can help me with it kindly do well to bid it urgent thanks looking forward too see you
Simthandile sim new indicator
40 - 300 USD
calcVolume( void ) { //--- MqlRates rates[]; if ( CopyRates ( _Symbol , PERIOD_CURRENT , startTime, endTime, rates) > 0 ) { double rangeHigh = rates[ 0 ].high, rangeLow = rates[ 0 ].low; int count = MathAbs ( iBarShift ( _Symbol , PERIOD_CURRENT , startTime) - iBarShift ( _Symbol , PERIOD_CURRENT , endTime)) + 1 ; //---VERTICAL PRICE RANGE for ( int b = 0
Gold HFT Signal Pro
30+ USD
Create an MT5 Expert Advisor (EA) for trading Gold (XAUUSD). The EA should provide BUY and SELL signals based on trend direction, market momentum, and price action. It should automatically place trades only when the entry conditions are met. Risk management: Use a small adjustable lot size. Include Stop Loss (SL) and Take Profit (TP). Include a maximum daily loss limit. Include a maximum number of open trades. Do not
Hello there, I am looking for a automated strategy for ninjatrader 5 Looking for a proven profit factor of 1.5 ( minimum ) on 15 mins time frame . I do MNQ futures I do not have the logic, but I like mean reverssion variable , plus RSI etc . that could make the automated tool robust and long lasting. i need fast response if you have
Date:29.08.2026 **TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS** PDF Attached for reference rest all details given below. Required: Creation, Integration and successful execution of trading algo/robot in MT5 using MT5 VPS. Brokers: Trades to be executed in both brokers Swissquote and Pepperstone. Symbols: All available in MT5. ** Common parameters for all executions: · Manual Start/Stop. · Session time (defined / always
DESCRIPTION I want both versions of the same trading system to be developed: Trading Indicator Trading EA (Expert Advisor) Both must follow exactly the same strategy and entry/exit logic . The main purpose of having both is to verify that the Indicator and EA produce the same signals, entries, SL, TP, BE and trade results under the same market conditions. IMPORTANT — DEMO VERIFICATION FIRST I have already faced
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD