작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
315
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
101
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
Looking for a programmer with good experience who can build a multi pairs EA to manage my all trades either open manually , remotely or by any other EA. This EA will work on all pairs when load it on any one chart. This EA will open either 1 ,2 or 3 trades with same lot & same SL but different TPs . EA will move the SL to entry price as soon trade 1 TP hits. 3 types of alerts requied with information ( notification
Hi everyone, I am looking for a commercially available MT5 Expert Advisor for trading Forex or CFD instruments. It does not need to work across every symbol; a system specialized in one or a few suitable Forex pairs, indices, or metals is perfectly acceptable. My main requirements are: Target historical annual return of approximately 10 0–300%+ , depending on the selected risk level Maximum equity drawdown of
EA Forex 100-300% per year
50 - 100 USD
Ho everyone I'm looking for an Expert advisors which Will produce at least 100-300% per year on the Forex CFD market. Every operation has ti have TP and SL, the maximum drawdown 20%. It doesn't necessarily have to work on every asset of course. Alright, that's all, let's see of something comes up. Budget is between 50 and 100 usd
i need a binary option trading indicator that does not repaint, i dont care the strategy i just need it to be non repaint . send a test version i will test for 2 days, my budget is $50
i want a deriv synthetic trading ea that can make 100% profit each day. i dont mind if its aggressive and uses martingale and grid. send a 48hours trial version so i can test my budget to buy ea is $50-100 if ea is good i will buy right away no delays. let me know how much capital your bot uses and what instrument it works on and timeframe and also setfiles. ultrathink. dont wast your time and apply if but cant make
Fundamental News Trading Strategy
50 - 200 USD
I want to build a fundamental news trading bot that trade off economic news data, as we know every economic news data released always have effect on the asset associated with it, so this bot will take a trade instantly based on the news data released either to buy or sell, it will come with good money management and also SL and TP target based on price and pips value
I have a EA/indicator that I want built. I should say 1st off dont know how to code myself so I will be using AI to verify that the source code is complete and matches the documents spec or if better so if you can not truly do the job do not waste either of out time. This is a idea I came.up wit and used AI to produce a framework for it.... and of course AI isn't 100% accurate so I need a knowledgeable quantitative
Specification : 1. Goal I am commissioning a mean-reversion grid Expert Advisor for XAUUSD on MT5. The deliverable is the complete, commented .mq5 source (strictly personal usel). Offers limited to compiled .ex5 will not be considered. 2. Required framework (non-negotiable) 2.1. Works natively on M5; signals evaluated on closed bars; symmetric long/short. 2.2. Entry logic built on Bollinger Bands + Moving Average
TumiiFX
30 - 20000 USD
1. Use two EMAs: 20 and 50. If EMA 20 is above EMA 50 → uptrend (look for buys) If EMA 20 is below EMA 50 → downtrend (look for sells) 2. Wait for a pullback into the area between the two EMAs. - For buys: price must touch or move between EMA 20 and EMA 50 during the last few candles. - For stils: same idea, but in a downtrend. 3. Entry signal: Buy: a bullish engulfing candle in an uptrend after the pullback
I Need HFT bot working on MT4
30 - 100 USD
I am looking for an experienced MQL4 developer to build a professional High-Frequency Trading (HFT) / Low-Latency Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 4 (MT4) . The EA will be deployed on an IC Markets Live account and should be optimized for the fastest possible execution using a low-latency VPS located in LD4 or NY4 . The primary instruments will be US30 and XAUUSD (Gold) . The goal is to create an EA capable of
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD