작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
315
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
101
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
Make Ea from Investor login
30 - 100 USD
Message me please for the investor login. You will replicate the ea and I shall tell u some things about it, I am not paying over $100. You should have great skills. The EA can handle any market and shall not blow the account
TPO
30+ USD
Develop an MT5 EA that continuously follows market direction using one active market position and one opposite trailing pending stop order. EA must be able to work with manual trading, any MT5 indicators, Strategy Tester, Live Account, all VPS and Demo Account. EA able to trade forex, XAUUSD, Indices and Cryptocurrencies
[7/6/2026 12:24 PM] DR.HassaN: Current Phase: Comprehensive Review & Final Enhancement_ This indicator is designed for the TradingView platform. Now that the core engines have been completed, I want to enter a comprehensive review and professional enhancement phase before adding any major new features. My goal is to transform this indicator into a premium institutional-grade TradingView indicator , both in terms of
Driven Multiple Choice
30+ USD
Part 1: Project setup Input settings (risk, stop loss, take profit, EMA periods) Indicator initialization Trade management framework Part 2: Trading logic EMA crossover detection Buy/Sell entry rules One-trade-per-symbol check Part 3: Risk management Automatic lot size calculation Stop-loss and take-profit placement Trade execution and error handling Part 4: Final touches On-screen information Optimization
Looking for a LOSING EA
30+ USD
I am looking for a losing EA . the idea behind is that some of the Strategies can be reversed into a positive strategy . In fact , most of the Experts -i think around %90 or more - can not be reversed into a positive strategy , but some fewer can be , around %10. İ will work to re-organize and reconstruct the strategy to make it a positive one. before selecting you can give .ex5 file and you will give me the open
Crypto Latency Arbitrage EA
30 - 5000 USD
I am looking for an experienced MQL4 or MQL5 developer to build a high-frequency (HFT) latency arbitrage Expert Advisor for cryptocurrency trading between LMAX and IC Markets. I need someone who understands low-latency execution, price feeds, slippage, spreads, and fast order execution. The basic idea is that LMAX acts as the leading price feed while IC Markets is the execution broker. The EA should constantly
Institutional‑Grade Multi‑Currency MT5 EA
1000 - 1300 USD
Hello, I am reopening this project with a fully updated and clarified specification. I am looking for a high‑level MQL5 developer who can deliver a clean, stable, and professional Phase 1 version of my: Institutional‑Grade Multi‑Currency MT5 EA (A2SR + SMC + Smart Recovery + Smart Grid + Liquidity + Volatility + Safety Filters) This EA is not a simple indicator conversion or a basic strategy. It is a structured
Profitable MT5 Expert Advisor
50 - 1000 USD
Hello, I am looking for an EA that generates few $ every day in a safe way, I especially do not want a martingale EA, the maximum open lot is 0.01 in any case, if you already have in your possession an EA like that already functional please send me a message
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to convert my existing trading strategy into a fully automated MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor (EA). Requirements: Develop a robust and efficient MQL5 Expert Advisor based on my EMA trading strategy. I will provide the complete trading logic, including entry, exit, risk management, and trade management rules. The EA should execute trades automatically without manual
I am looking for an expert MQL5 developer to build a robust, professional Expert Advisor for Gold (XAUUSD). The EA must be Event-Driven (OnTick) with no 'Sleep' functions, ensuring instant execution. Core Logic: Grid Strategy: Start with 0.02 Buy/Sell. Lot size sequence: 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.09, 0.14, 0.26, 0.44, 0.75, 1.28, 2.18 (Max 10 steps). Dynamic TP: Total basket TP must update instantly upon new order
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD