작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
315
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
101
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
Création d'un robot sur MQL5
630 - 640 USD
Bonjour, je recherche un développeur MQL5 expérimenté pour créer un Expert Advisor pour MetaTrader 5 basé sur une stratégie de trading intégrant des principes de gestion des risques rigoureux et d'intelligence financière. Le robot doit être capable de gérer plusieurs paires de devises et d'optimiser automatiquement les entrées et sorties en fonction de conditions de marché prédéfinies."
MT4/MT5 HFT EA us30
30 - 3000 USD
Hello everybody, I'm looking for an experienced MQL4/MQL5 developer to optimize a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Expert Advisor for both MT4 and MT5. The EA performs consistently and profitably on demo accounts, but when it is run on Raw and Standard live accounts under what appear to be the same trading conditions, it begins generating losses. I do not have the original source code (.mq4/.mq5); I only have the
Hello All , Please build a MT5 EA that will enter/exit trades on a color change of this particular custom indicator. So It will be like: 1-NON REPAINTING COLOUR confirmed enter buy. 2-NON REPAINTING COLOUR confirmed exit buy and enter sell. 3-NON REPAINTING COLOUR confirmed exit sell and enter buy. The expert must have fixed (example 30 pips) stop loss and spread must be taken into account
I'm looking for an experienced NinjaTrader 8 (C#) developer to build a fully automated futures trading strategy. Please apply only if you have proven experience developing and testing NinjaTrader strategies. Project Overview Develop a fully automated NinjaTrader 8 strategy. Designed for Apex funded and evaluation accounts. Primary instruments: NQ/MNQ Futures (with flexibility to support other futures later). Trading
Need an already built EA with proven track record
30 - 1000 USD
Hello I need to purchase the source code of an already built profitable mt5 EA with proven track recordIf you have something similar and you are open to selling the source code please apply to this post Please note I am not looking for a dev to build the product from scratch , but need something that is already built and have at least one year worth of track record
Looking for a Prop Firm Developer
100+ USD
I'm looking to passively pass a prop firm challenge (goal 8k limit 3k [1.5k drawdown]) . I prefer it to operate as a cycle trader on the ES or NQ but I am looking for effectiveness over preference. Do you have something like this
Looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to refactor and upgrade an existing Expert Advisor (EA) trading system. Current State: I have the fully working Phase 1 .mq5 source code. However, the execution rules are overly rigid, resulting in missed setups. Scope of Work (Phase 2): Refactor entry logic to support multi-timeframe EMA trend alignment (H4 structural trend + M5/M15 execution EMAs). Upgrade pullback state
Supply and Demand
30+ USD
GBPUSD Demand & Supply EA 1. Trend Direction 1H timeframe 50 EMA and 200 EMA BUY bias: 50 EMA above 200 EMA SELL bias: 50 EMA below 200 EMA 2. Demand & Supply Zones Identify strong moves away from a base Prefer fresh zones Avoid zones that have already been repeatedly tested 3. Trendlines Use ascending trendlines to support BUY setups Use descending trendlines to support SELL setups Trendline must support the overall
SCALPER EA
30+ USD
the best SCALPER EA THIS ROBOT only takes a winning posetio IT ANALYSIS THE MARKET BEFOR OPENING POSETION AND WAIT FOR A CLEAR SIGNAL LOT SIZE AJUSTEBLE TAKE PROFIT AJUSTBLE
Hi, I’m looking for a developer who can create a trading bot designed to generate a 6% profit. The daily loss limit is 3% and the total loss limit is 8%. So my aim is to have a bot that has a probability of over 75% of reaching the 6% target before hitting the loss limit. I’d like the bot to work on MT5 and TradeLocker, please
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD