작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
316
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
102
32%
작업중
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
I’m looking for a **ready-made MT5 scalping EA specifically for Gold (XAUUSD)**. My main requirement is an **HTF scalping strategy**, so I’m looking for an existing robot that is already developed and can be tested before I make the purchase. I would like to test on demo account first, Any available backtest or trading results * Whether I can test it on a demo account * Your price and licensing details I’m
Request for an Existing Automated Trading System (Expert Advisor) I am looking to acquire an existing, fully functional Expert Advisor (EA) that trades Forex CFDs, with the option of trading other CFDs if the strategy supports them safely. Performance objectives Target average net monthly return: 1.5%. A consistent 1.0% monthly return may be considered if the system demonstrates strong risk control and credible
Hi All, I am looking for a bot EA which makes good profit. If any having please share it for TEST. After proper TESTING only I will make the payment, no cheating no fraud. Please do not waste the time also
Allow me to set the daily trading bias manually to BUY or SELL. Check my defined 4H and 1H trend-alignment conditions. Execute entries based on my 15-minute pullback and continuation rules. Trade only between 06:00 and 16:00 Nigeria time, Monday to Friday. Calculate lot size based on my chosen risk percentage and stop-loss distance. Automatically place stop-loss and take-profit orders. Enforce my daily trade limits
QUANTOWER DEVELOPER NEEDS
60+ USD
hi, I need a quantower script I need a trailing stop at the 20 ema, And a more complicated version would be a breakout of the Asian session and a retest of the 9ema for an entry and a training stop at the 20 ema
Hi, I’m looking for a **ready-made MT5 scalping EA specifically for Gold (XAUUSD)**. My main requirement is an **HTF scalping strategy**, so I’m looking for an existing robot that is already developed and can be tested before I make the purchase. I’m not looking to build one from scratch at this stage. I would like to first test the EA on a **demo account** to see how it performs under live market conditions and
Rebate robot
30 - 100 USD
Need rebate robot,for pairs like gbpusd,eurusd,usdjpy,usdchf,Spreads are like around 2.5 pip,MAy be better hedge ea both buy and sell,i will get benifit just from rebate,so try ur best to do what i want,and if u r not expert plz go away plz its not simple job,if u already have the robot so i can test it will be surely selected,also u can get some benifit from this screen shoots that i attached,its from another job in
We are looking for an experienced MQL5 developer or algorithmic trader who already owns a fully developed, functional, and profitable Expert Advisor (EA) specifically designed or successfully tested for Prop Firm trading. We are not looking for someone to develop a new trading robot from scratch. Our priority is to collaborate with someone who already has an operational trading system with a proven track record
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer or development team to build a scalable Telegram-to-MT5 copy trading system. The main purpose of the system is to monitor trading signals from my Telegram channel and automatically execute those signals on connected client MT5 accounts. Core Requirements Receive and parse trading signals from Telegram Automatically execute trades on connected MT5 accounts Support more
Hi, I’m looking to develop a custom XAUUSD (Gold) trading EA for MT5. I initially wanted to get an EA, but I don’t currently have a specific trading strategy. I would like help developing a suitable strategy from scratch and then converting it into a fully automated MT5 EA. My account size will be around $1,000. I’m interested in a scalping strategy that can trade during both the London and New York sessions. My main
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD