작업 종료됨
실행 시간 9 일
피고용인의 피드백
I appreciate and am honored working with you. I look forward to more endeavors.
Thank you.
고객의 피드백
A pleasure to work with, very patient and understanding & would have no problem working with Maxwell again.
명시
I have an algorithm which is based on candlestick formations - specifically the hammer candle formation.
Previously, the algorithm only executed short positions on bearish hammers & long positions on bullish hammers.
Now, however, I'm wanting to introduce inverse hammers, but keeping the wicks in the same positions (i.e., extended lower wicks for short positions and extended upper wicks for long positions)
It's not so much the interpretations of the global & local declarations themselves that are the issue, but it's the placement of the brackets that needs to be altered, as well as maybe introducing the "OR" or "ELSE IF" logic but I'll leave that up to you.
The instructions I'm needing it to follow - in layman’s terms - is the following:
"If '(BarTime != Time[0])' is true,
then assess if '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' is True.
If (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) is True, then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are also True, then execute a position.
Alternatively (OR/ELSE IF) if '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' is true,
then assess if all of it's child statements are true.
If all of its child statements are true, then execute a position”.
Therefore, if(BarTime != Time[0]) must always be TRUE, but dependant on weather '(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen)' or '(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)' will determine which set of child statements will be assessed to determine if a poition should be open.
Obviously (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) & (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) are mutually exclusive criteria (the closing price can either be above the opening or below the opening - doji's aren't allowed), there is no point in the EA assessing the child statements under (hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) when (hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and visa-versa.
To put it another way "if(BarTime != Time[0]), assess "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)".
If "if(hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen)" is FALSE (for example), go straight to if(hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) and assess all child statements here".
I hope this helps, if you need any clarification, let me know.
The code in question is on line 315 (short position criteria) and line 795 (long position criteria).
I have enclosed documentation for the EA which includes the explanations to the Global Declarations which you will come across.
if(BarTime != Time[0]) { if((hammerHeadClose < hammerHeadOpen) && (bearHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bearHammerHandle) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bearHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) if((hammerHeadClose > hammerHeadOpen) && (bullHammerHead >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (bearHammerHandleInv!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bearHammerHandleInv) <= hammerHandlePct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (bullHammerHead / bullRetracementCandle) <= hammerHeadPct) && (bullRetracementCandle!=0 && (initialTrendBearCandle / bullRetracementCandle) <= retracePercentage) && (bullRetracementCandle >= Transform(candleBodyLength,2)) && (trendFast < trendSlow) && (momentumFast < momentumSlow) && (NewBar) && (spread <= MaxSpread) && (hourOfDay >= startingHour && hourOfDay < endingHour) && (OrdersTotal()== 0)) { bool OpenShort = OrderSend(.....); /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ /*----------code----------*/ } }
응답함
1
등급
프로젝트
204
30%
중재
25
40%
/
44%
기한 초과
12
6%
무료
2
등급
프로젝트
4
0%
중재
2
0%
/
100%
기한 초과
1
25%
무료
3
등급
프로젝트
239
70%
중재
3
67%
/
33%
기한 초과
20
8%
무료
4
등급
프로젝트
317
34%
중재
63
37%
/
40%
기한 초과
102
32%
무료
게재됨: 1 기고글
5
등급
프로젝트
478
40%
중재
105
40%
/
24%
기한 초과
82
17%
로드됨
게재됨: 2 코드
6
등급
프로젝트
11
18%
중재
0
기한 초과
3
27%
무료
7
등급
프로젝트
47
30%
중재
12
17%
/
75%
기한 초과
6
13%
무료
비슷한 주문
My MQL5 Expert Advisor wins most trades with small profits, then suddenly takes one large loss that wipes out weeks of gains. This is the "picking up pennies in front of a steamroller" pattern. Required fix: Find the exact cause of the large losses in the code. Cap the loss on every trade with a fixed stop loss (no martingale or averaging down). Stop trading in dangerous conditions (high volatility, strong trends
AI Forex Trading Bot for MT4 and MT5 I need an advanced Forex trading robot (Expert Advisor) that works on both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. The robot should automatically analyse the Forex market, identify BUY and SELL opportunities, and execute trades when the trading conditions are met. It should support GBPUSD, EURUSD, USDJPY and GBPJPY. The robot should use EMA, RSI, MACD, price action and trend analysis
Name: SteelEdge Platform: MetaTrader 5 (MQL5) Expert Advisor Instruments: XAUUSD, EURUSD, US30 Timeframe: H1 (inputs to change it) STRATEGY - Trend filter: buy only when price is above the 200 EMA, sell only when below - Entry: price pulls back to the 50 EMA and a bullish (buy) or bearish (sell) engulfing candle closes - Confirmation: RSI(14) above 50 for buys, below 50 for sells - Stop loss: 1.5 x ATR(14) - Take
EXISTING PROFITABLE MT5 EXPERT ADVISOR
30 - 80 USD
I need an existing mt5 expert advisor that can been in trading for more than 12 months. The PF of the ea should not be less than 2.0 and be in profit in the last four months with average profit of not less than 20% per month. The Maximum drawdown should be less than 20% and Max deposit load less than 10%. Such ea should be able to trade with less than or equal to $300. Whats needed is .ex5 and source file is also
Ready to use MT5 bot
99 - 6990 USD
seller must provide the following to be considered... i will answer to all who fit this description, and can purchase more than 1 EA... - brief strategy description - overall EA expectancy - 1 week limited trial version, with whatever settings you consider best
MT5 DEVELOPER NEEDS
30+ USD
I am a trader looking to acquire an existing, stable, and consistently profitable Expert Advisor (EA) specifically designed primarily for Gold (XAUUSD). This is an outright purchase. I am not interested in developing a new EA from scratch. I am only interested in ready-to-use systems with a genuine, verifiable track record of performance
Aziz Toure
50 - 400 USD
I am an independent trader and entrepreneur based in Côte d’Ivoire. I work in financial markets, analyze trading opportunities, and provide digital financial services. I am also interested in international trade, online business, and developing long-term business activities
SMC Bot Creation
350 - 550 USD
Hello, I am interested in developing a professional MT5 Expert Advisor similar in functionality and technical sophistication to your reference product, Institutional SMC Robot: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/187011 I want to develop my own independent EA based on advanced Smart Money Concepts (SMC), with a strong focus on institutional price action, liquidity and market structure. The key functionalities I
(I can't pay 30 for this of course if you can just help.me solve this problem I would appreciate you )It was doing everything perfectly until yesterday this happened this is a python file that copies from telegram Iand send to ea signal if you have any idea what to do or why this happened please tell me
اريد ربوتات يستخدم Mgl5
30+ USD
Specify your Requirements Specification here point by point. Try to describe your requirements briefly and clearly, so that your potential developer is able to correctly assess its complexity and cost, as well as the required execution time. A bad or too generic description will result in your order being ignored, or you will spend a lot of time negotiating the details with each applicant. Remember: It is better to
프로젝트 정보
예산
30+ USD