|
1 año
experiencia
|
0
productos
|
0
versiones demo
|
|
0
trabajos
|
0
señales
|
0
suscriptores
|
Business Operation System Support
en
Eaten by the pandemic
John Lim
MY OPINION ON EA BONNITTA
The price is really high, well if it was performing as backtested. I would still think it is worthed. But after using it for a couple of months.
Is the EA working? Does it open trades?
Yes, it is working and it does open trades.
Is it profitable?
So far, I'm making around 10% per month using 2 pairs and a capital of 3k.
Is the EA perfect?
Sadly, it is not. I've found out that without an SL I could end up with an order stuck in negative floating for months.
The trailing system is buggy.
The pending order does not perform like in the backtest. So whatever you're seeing in the backtest. It's completely useless and a waste.
There's a parameter to set a limit of pairs to trade at a time. It often malfunctions, and it will open more than the limit. My solution was not to use the one-chart system.
It is missing some useful features in the EA. It was explained in the manual you can input a command to open an instant trading position. But this would be a hassle. Wouldn't it be more convenient if there was some panel with buttons to do that?
For the price point, I was hoping the EA would be more refined and the author would care enough to update and fix the bugs quickly. But that is not the case. You will not get a satisfactory answer from the author and nor does he care about the bugs in the EA. I guess as long as people keep buying it.
The price is really high, well if it was performing as backtested. I would still think it is worthed. But after using it for a couple of months.
Is the EA working? Does it open trades?
Yes, it is working and it does open trades.
Is it profitable?
So far, I'm making around 10% per month using 2 pairs and a capital of 3k.
Is the EA perfect?
Sadly, it is not. I've found out that without an SL I could end up with an order stuck in negative floating for months.
The trailing system is buggy.
The pending order does not perform like in the backtest. So whatever you're seeing in the backtest. It's completely useless and a waste.
There's a parameter to set a limit of pairs to trade at a time. It often malfunctions, and it will open more than the limit. My solution was not to use the one-chart system.
It is missing some useful features in the EA. It was explained in the manual you can input a command to open an instant trading position. But this would be a hassle. Wouldn't it be more convenient if there was some panel with buttons to do that?
For the price point, I was hoping the EA would be more refined and the author would care enough to update and fix the bugs quickly. But that is not the case. You will not get a satisfactory answer from the author and nor does he care about the bugs in the EA. I guess as long as people keep buying it.
· 3
kmli6644
2023.04.04
Thanks for your review. I want to buy it, but the price is very high. I want more real comment. Thank you.
[Eliminado]
2023.05.09
[Eliminado]
John Lim
I've started writing about my experience with the EAs I've tried. I feel like the market is constantly filled with EA that is excellent in backtest but in live or demo accounts it is not performing the same or similar. A bit of background about me, like any others I've started using EA with zero knowledge. I tried all the EAs on the first page with highly positive reviews. Apparently, that did not guarantee outstanding results. I've discovered that, if I want to make a profit right away the best way is to choose a martingale trading system, once in a while you will end up with a margin call. My solution to this was increasing the capital to deal with the drawdown. The best thing about martingale EA, it is not broker sensitive. On the other hand, for all these single-entry scalping EAs, I have to be extra patient. Not all trades will be positive and the recovery could take weeks to months. Most of them are broker sensitive too. Money management and managing risk is the key. There's no holy grail. I haven't found one anyway.
· 3