Keith Watford / Profile

Hi, I recently went to close a chart and accidently shut down the platform (Why are those X's so close together?) So I started the platform again and it auto-updated to build 625 from 610. Next time I looked at MetaEditor, there was the small message

I have just spent hours trying to find an error in my code. It turned out to be the simple case of using = where I should have put == I don't know if it is common knowledge or not, but the compiler did not pick up on the error. In this example bool

This is part of my code

I am noticing more instances of poster's using "texting" style language creeping into the forum. Can I respectfully ask that posters use the English language? Not everyone's native language is English and your posts may just seem like

Up until now, I guess that I have only used integers when using % in my code. double remainder = 100 % 30 ; works fine double remainder = 100 % 30.1 ; Compiler reports error '%' - illegal operation use as does double remainder = 100.00 % 30 ; double

I don't know if I am the only one that has an issue with this. I find that whenever there is a long line of code included that is wider than my screen, I then have to keep scrolling left and right in order to read the rest of the page. Sometimes

I see this a lot when people post their code. if (a==b){ Dothis; Dothis; etc; } Now, this is not a problem when reading short pieces of other people's code. But when their is a lot of code, it can make it almost impossible to follow. I would think

I've searched and this issue has been addressed many times. but I have been unable to find the solution. I feel that there may be a glaringly obvious mistake in my code that I just can't see. This is part of the code NormalizeDouble (SL, 5 );

I would guess that quite a few of the posters here have used various indicators in their technical analysis and incorporated the indicators in their work. I do wonder, has anyone actually used an indicator and found it to work consistently in the

I haven't been able to find the answer in the documentation. in situations such as changing timeframes etc, the expert is deinitialised. What I need to know is whether the the code execution in start() will always continue until it hits return(0)