Is there a pattern to the chaos? Let's try to find it! Machine learning on the example of a specific sample. - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is how the model looks on the training sample - you can see a good delta margin between the green and red curve - this is profit.
But below we can see how the delta has shrunk on the exam sample
Compared to the tester, the calculated balance turned out to be a bit more optimistic, but the structure is identical - I think I will continue to use it for initial evaluation.
This is how the model looks in the training sample - you can see a good margin of delta between the green and red curve - this is profit.
But below we can see how the delta has shrunk on the exam sample
Compared to the tester, the calculated balance turned out to be a bit more optimistic, but the structure is identical - I think I will continue to use it for initial evaluation.
0.01050 is best. It's about the same as yours. But the balance line is different. And the error is about 0.5. It's risky, it will deteriorate a little bit and may start to drain. 4200 trades and win only 0.01050 /4200 ~= 0.00002 per trade. Very risky. Spread, slippage, etc. will eat up all the winnings.
Due to the model the percentage of profitable trades increased by 4%, plus MM will give the same amount - and now you can think about exploitation.
But I think that this markup is not correct, because it is not based on the market structure - there is no attempt to compare similar market conditions for training, so the model has to do everything by itself.
Also, I think that the balance should be determined in the end by two models (buy and sell) - because they can self-compensate.
Also, I think that the balance should be determined in the end by two models (buy and sell) - because they can self-compensate.
Train on the first 2 columns) On the last sample on H1.
Does the time pattern pick up?
Is it picking up a temporal pattern?
I do. See what you get
I'm having a bit of fun with a different approach at the moment - no chance to test it yet. But I think it will also find it, if it's obvious.
I'm having a bit of fun with a different approach now - no opportunity to check it yet. But I think it will also find it, if everything is obvious there.
The point is that it is 2 times better than on 5000+ features.
It turns out that all the other 5000+ features only worsen the result. Though if you select them, you will surely find some that improve.
It is interesting to compare what your model will show on these 2.