How can you trust the analysis after that? - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is impossible to tell unequivocally from the volumes what is happening. If the volume is large, it is a set of positions for further movement, or an exit from a large deal in parts, or many small deals of many buyers/sellers.
Accordingly there are as many interpretations of this line.
Well, by the volumes confirmed by the events and the movement in the adjacent, allied instruments.
The past is well known, we can take all data and not deny ourselves anything :-) That is, not just a volume has passed, but something caused it and its consequences. But this is long, tedious and expensive, because it requires an expert (person)
it's faster to start drawing a wave markup
well, by volumes confirmed by events and movement on related, allied instruments...
The past is known, you can take all the data and do not deny yourself anything :-) That is, not just a volume has passed, but something caused it and its consequences. But this is long, tedious and expensive, because it requires an expert (person)
it's faster to start drawing the wave markup
One can only speculate about the behavior of traders in the past in a probabilistic way. Since we can only guess about the intentions of those who stood in the volumes of buying/selling.
Looking at the video clips from Forts, the volumes may help someone in pipsing deals or more accurate entries in a set of positions. When they set a small stop for volume. However, with the advent of robots this is probably not very effective. In other cases, concerning the order volumes in the market - these orders will be cancelled a thousand times and new ones will be introduced till we think that something may be done about them. The simple already traded volumes, as I said before, are little informative. If only as a detector of some activity per se.
The behaviour of traders in the past can also only be discussed in a probabilistic way. We can only speculate about the intentions of those who were in buy/sell volumes.
Looking at the video clips from Forts, the volumes may help someone in pipsing deals or more accurate entries in a set of positions. When they set a small stop for volume. However, with the advent of robots this is probably not very effective. In other cases, concerning the order volumes in the market - these orders will be cancelled a thousand times and new ones will be introduced till we think that something may be done about them. The simple already traded volumes, as I said before, are little informative. If only as a detector of some kind of activity per se.
I don't think we're talking about the same thing...
When building a markup, the volumes should be taken into account in order to account for this particular pivot point. They should be there. If the pivot is without significant volume, then it is caused by adjacent markets, and not by local comrades.
The behaviour of traders in the past can also only be discussed in a probabilistic way. We can only speculate about the intentions of those who stood in buy/sell volumes.
Looking at the video clips from Forts, the volumes may help someone in pipsing deals or more accurate entries in a set of positions. When they set a small stop for volume. However, with the advent of robots this is probably not very effective. In other cases, concerning the order volumes in the market - these orders will be cancelled a thousand times and new ones will be introduced till we think that something may be done about them. The simple already traded volumes, as I said before, are little informative. If only as a detector of some activity per se.
Whatever it is, but why should I draw lines drawn by shadows, you can draw it by air temperature, the principle is the same.
If you do, at least do it correctly.
Here's a piece of secance I made, I couldn't get it right, I wasted the whole holiday on it.
where will the price go if we buy in blue?
// all lines should continue and you'll see exactly where the volumes were in such quantity as indicated
forecast from the 7th, it's drawn solid...
we seem to be talking about different things...
When a marking is constructed to account for that particular point (the U-turn), volumes must be taken into account. They have to be there. If the pivot is without significant volume, then it is caused by adjacent markets, and not by local comrades.
Anyway, why draw lines drawn from shadows, you can also draw from air temperature, the principle is the same.
If you do draw, at least do it correctly.
Is there a benchmark for correctness? Or is it like a trend/fletch part depending on the strategy?
Here's a piece of secance I made, I couldn't get it right, I wasted the whole holiday on it.
where will the price go if we buy in blue?
// all lines should continue and you'll see exactly where the volumes were in such quantity as indicated
forecast from the 7th, it's drawn solid...
Sorry generously, the answer in the form of a question is of course original, but I don't want to guess who was standing on whom from the picture. If you wanted to explain/answer, you should have shown it.
I personally understood it this way. You mean the lines drawn from volumes in the past have propagated into the future and we look how the price behaves in the present near these lines. Most likely.
Well, you can draw a lot of such lines with very different behavior in the present near them. Do you have a gradation of the significance of the levels from the past? Do you have a gradation of significance from the past? I would not like to argue. Let's say there is, but I doubt it.
Now Vitya will draw it correctly, he knows how