Random wandering - page 7

 
Hmmm... Have they started wandering again?
 

By the way, I don't agree with the statement that you can't make money on SB trading. I suggest the following plan.

1) A quantum MSF is purchased, which gives the opportunity to obtain a true SB, not a pseudo.

2) Creates, patents and publishes an algorithm for the TS which is profitable for the SB.

3) A Nobel Prize is obtained for disproof of modern officially recognized quantum physics.

4) Gets a big prize for finding vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems using quantum GSR.

5) Optional, optional. Half percent of the profit is transferred to me - for the idea.

 
In addition, there is an article(https://smart-lab.ru/blog/579572.php), which also states the possibility of earning on the tab. I cannot check this method, because I do not know the method of cumulative sums (Cusum). If Who understands, a huge request to repeat the experiment and eventually make a big table of results.
Как заработать на случайном блуждании. Часть 1
Как заработать на случайном блуждании. Часть 1
  • smart-lab.ru
Добрый день, господа! Начиная серию публикаций о способе заработка на случайных процессах и, в частности, на классическом случайном блуждании (т.н.
 
and here is another article on the subject(https://smart-lab.ru/blog/699573.php).
Физико-математические основы Грааля. Часть 13. И вновь о случайном блуждании...
Физико-математические основы Грааля. Часть 13. И вновь о случайном блуждании...
  • smart-lab.ru
Время от времени, на разных форумах, то и дело вспыхивают ожесточенные споры: можно или нет заработать на случайном блуждании? В
 
ILYA_365:
and here is another article on the subject(https://smart-lab.ru/blog/699573.php).
It was written by A_K, an apologist for this movement, who has gone religiously insane
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
It was A_K who wrote, the apologist for this movement, went religiously insane

If it doesn't work on the sb, then refute it, only constructively, not with the phrase "It doesn't work".

 
ILYA_365:

If it doesn't work on the sb, then refute it, only constructively, not with the phrase "It doesn't work".

In this case, nothing is more constructive than the phrase "It doesn't work".

How can you explain that 2x2=4 to someone who thinks 2x2=5?

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

In this case, there is nothing more constructive than the phrase "it doesn't work".

How can you explain that 2x2=4 to those who think that 2x2=5?

2x2=4 can easily be proved on apples, for example.

 
ILYA_365:

2x2=4 can easily be proved by, for example, apples.

Try

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

Try

I beg you, don't clutter up the thread, if your purpose was to say that "It's impossible to make money on sb", then I heard you and you may not write anything else here.