A win-win forex trading system. First test round. - page 9

 
a007:

Can I put it on a VPS?

It's a martin (sooner or later it will sell out), plus the code is very raw (just for testing).
 
Petr Voytenko:
This is a martin (sooner or later it will fail), besides the code is very raw (just for the test).


You have to trade things like this. If you don't know how to identify the phase of the market. If it goes over the line, stop trading, the phase is not suitable, and the line is a "detector" or "threshold", if you are lucky enough to get into the right phase from the beginning and it starts to lose late, it will be very good :))))

 
Petr Voytenko:

Sketched out Expert Advisor - opens 2 orders in different directions, after the first one is pipped, the second one is added and averaged.

Drawdown is high, profitability is below normal, trading activity is low

It is not very simple yet

 
Wizard2018:


You have to trade things like this. If you don't know how to identify the phase of the market. If it goes over the line, stop the trade, the phase is not suitable, and the line is a "detector" or "threshold", if you are lucky enough to get into the right phase from the beginning and it starts to lose late, it will be very good :))))

One time not getting into a phase is enough to lose up to 500 baht from a minimum Lot and one order, that's just for one asset, not to mention martingale.
It happens so that the market phases change several times an hour, during the periods of high volatility. Nothing written in this article will ever stand up to this.
Unless, of course, you approach it in a clumsy way.
 
Maxim Romanov:

I used to have a mess in my head too, but I tried to structure it. There are too many misconceptions and unsubstantiated statements in trading. So right away I will try to make life easier and speed up learning.

1) Locks - forget about them and use them only to facilitate logical understanding. Any strategy with locks in a hedge account can be transformed into a netting strategy without locks. Set a lock = close the position. Unbroken a lock = close and open positions. trading with a lock, you pay double the commission/spread and lose money faster than you would without it. You can't break a lock. You either trade profitably because you know how to do it or you don't. If you know how to trade profitably, you don't need the lock, if you don't - the lock is of no help. YOU CANNOT BREAK THE LOCK!

2) averaging - works only on asymmetric instruments with pronounced trends (stocks). For if the expected payoff of the trading strategy = 0, then no averaging will bring it to the profit, it is impossible.

3) Martingale, forget about it like a bad dream and a nightmare. The martingale can be used to gain something only if the expected payoff is greater than zero. But in this case it is not needed. If the trade is negative, the martingale will not help at all, it is proven by all mathematicians in the world. Martingale only helps to cheat subscribers.


3)

+ 100!

 
Aleksey Mavrin:

+ 100!

If the price goes into a perpetual flat, that's even better for this strategy.

Task will be to multiply the minus and 'dissolve into equity' 🙃

If there will always be a straight line, then connect whatever else is twitching.
 
Aleksey Mavrin:

+ 100!

and he seems to have had a dramatic change of heart.

because the post has been deleted.

;)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

and he seems to have had a dramatic change of heart

because the post has been deleted.

;)

All critics of locks and the use of lot manipulation share their negative experiences in this field. And those who have a positive experience, either keep silent, or at best make hints).

 
khorosh:

All critics of locks and the use of lot manipulation share their negative experiences in this area. Those with positive experiences either keep quiet or make hints at best).

But then the real meaning of lots is lost immediately, because no matter where you open a lock, you still open it to one side or the other, and it is analogous to the opening of an order, and it will always be so with any implementation of lots.
 
CHINGIZ MUSTAFAEV:
If you do not have a good technical analysis, then yes, Loki can replace this analysis, but unlike simple analysis, it costs money.

It's just cold.

at the start of the journey