From theory to practice. Part 2 - page 24

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

I'm not interested in YOU as a TS creator, much less as a trader.))

Is your opinionworth anything?

 
Олег avtomat:

Is your opinionworth anything?

Yes, it is. But I prefer not to talk to drunks.

 
I'll pass by.
 

OOO !

to practice...

;)

 
Andrei Trukhanovich:

Don't you get tired of spreading your nonsense around the forum?

Tell me more about the CME betting volumetric bullshit ;)

I don't know what you're talking about... I don't know what you're talking about...

 
secret:
We can revive the branch without Shurik's involvement. There would be less swearing and more use.)


And where is the revival?

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


And where is the revival?

We need a better version of Shurik) Someone just as energetic, but writing only what everyone likes)

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

We need a better version of Shurik) Someone just as energetic, but writing only what everyone likes)

About wizards and wizards? Then it's Joan Rowling.

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

Need a better version of Shurik) Someone as energetic, but writing only what everyone likes).

Suggest something yourself. You only do philosophy here for the importance of your persona.)

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

You should have suggested something yourself. You're just doing philosophy here for the importance of your persona.)

Not philosophy, but like you - fludogony. The only difference is my lack of alcoholic intoxication and mild methanol poisoning and yours.