From theory to practice. Part 2 - page 40
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Anyway, I'm not here to argue, but just to hint that there should be at least some explanations for the pictures. Otherwise you get a lot of rubbish that no one can understand.
Maybe you can attach some figures, facts, something substantive, not just hypotheses, theories and assumptions?
I've seen a little bit of code, even a little bit of it.
It's not my fault you only read the last page.
;)
you have to earn
it's simpler and easier to understand.
practically in detail above, there was even a little bit of code.
It's not my fault you only read the last page.
;)
I've read most of your articles, I remember the method of calculation too.
It would work if the prices diverge and converge at the same point, which almost never happens.
In the indicator, everything is rosy and beautiful, but in reality (where the quote jumps) it's not so funny.
I have read most of your articles, and I remember the calculation method too.
All this would work if prices would diverge and converge at the same point, which almost never happens.
As for the indicator, everything looks nice and rosy, but in reality (where the quote leaps) it's not so funny.
You're right, this question has been haunting me for 10 years.
The answer - in a two-legged arbitrage there is a third leg missing, which is the delta
but the triangle is a very hard nut to crack, very
even a grail against the triangle:
You're right, it's been bugging me for 10 years.
The answer is that the two-legged arbitrator is missing a third leg, which is where the delta ends up.
But the triangle is a very tough nut to crack, very...Maybe it's not a nut at all, maybe there is no nut at all. Did you calculate its existence or the prerequisites for its existence before taking it on?
You're right, it's been bugging me for 10 years.
10 years... How the hell did you have the patience?
And you don't have "3 legs"?? 10 years of work and no reason to believe it's the right path???
Maybe you should reconsider? Take a qualitative leap? No?
even a grail in the background of a triangle
10 years and it's...
f...
no words...
Don't you really have anything working and guaranteed statistical axioms on which to base your judgements?
All ten years of "pointing your finger in the sky"? ? Is that all?
or maybe it's not a nut at all, maybe there is no nut at all? Did you calculate its existence or the prerequisites for its existence before taking it on?
to check, you open like this (no matter where or on what market, even if it's a demo)
EURGBP-1,37 lots, buy.
EURUSD -1,0 lot, sell
GBPUSD - 1.0 lot, buy
and you will see that equity will stand in one place for several years.
minus the spread and swap
where prices go - whatever10 years and it's...
f...
no words...
Don't you really have anything working and guaranteed statistical axioms on which to base your judgements?
All ten years of "pointing your finger in the sky"? ? Is that all?
no
The answer has been found, as written in the previous pages
To check, open like this (it does not matter where or on which market, even if it is a demo)
EURGBP -1,37 lot, buy
EURUSD -1,0 lot, sell
GBPUSD - 1.0 lot, buy
and you will see that equity will stand in one place for several years.
minus the spread and swap.
where prices go - whateverOk, I will try it tomorrow.
The idea is
It will be in the stock as the movements are synchronous.
EURUSD -1.0 lot, sell
GBPUSD - 1.0 lot, buy
And this is the difference:
EURGBP -1.37 lot, buy and it will change)
I wonder if nothing will change, then it's kind of a loss of potential somewhere in the price mechanism...