There are programmers who have written 1000 EAs each and haven't found a single grail yet. There is not a single grail for 1000 EAs? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I say can you make EA and publish in Codebase?
Of course I can. I'm registered as a seller.
I just don't need it - the League Experts are provided free of charge. If you're interested, I can even provide you with source code... If someone isn't afraid to wade through OOP-hacks. I've posted fragments of my code more than once... I've shared them with others as well...
Say, fxsaber has all my library... Or fsxaber is not a programmer too, do you think ?
Of course I can. I'm registered as a seller.
I just don't need it - the League Experts are provided free of charge. If you're interested, I can even provide you with source code... If someone isn't afraid to wade through OOP-hacks. I've posted fragments of my code more than once... I've shared them with others as well...
Say, fxsaber has all my library... Or maybe fsxsaber isn't a programmer too ?
You think so?
I've told you before - my journey into algotrading started with a collaboration with a "manual" trader who developed a "unique" TS that "cannot be programmed". The system showed profit on more than ten years of history. At the same time, the author insisted that the rules of the system were "very clear".
But if the rules are "clear" - then it is possible to program it. So he and I did it. And we succeeded.
But the resulting Expert Advisor worked only up to one month. Then it started to "hang in the balance", and after a couple of months - it has lost all its gains. That's when I thought - why bother developing systems for many years, and then cramming them into code, if they work exactly the same way as the simplest, "dumbest" systems.
Later, when I shared this idea on this forum, I was asserted that "the simplest EAs cannot earn money by principle", say, the TS on MAKS can not earn money under any parameters. I wanted to check this statement. The result was the League of Trading Systems. It proves that the simplest TS earn the same way as the simplest ones. And they fail in exactly the same way. The key to always being in profit is to constantly switch between TS. And in order to switch you must always have a set of TS ready to work. This is what the league is for, this is how I use it.
I get it, excuses and redirection, like always.
Think what you like. I'm not going to prove anything to you.
It's like writing autopilot for a car.
I doubt it. Autopilot operates under stationary conditions. But the market is fundamentally non-stationary.
Therefore, I argue that both a complex and a simple Expert Advisor will profit and lose with equal probability. And if so, it is better to have a dozen simple ones than one ten times more complicated one.
Think what you like. I'm not going to prove anything to you.
Say, fxsaber has my entire library...
Acknowledged. On the subject - currently busy running (not writing) a pseudo-grail.
Acknowledged. On a side note - currently busy running (not writing) a pseudo-grail.
Are you going to go back to your tics again?
You're like a burdock, clinging to everyone. Burdock is a weed, you're a weed here on the forum too. If I were the moderators, I'd pull you up by the roots and send you to the bathhouse for a month. To give you a rest.
You're like a burdock, clinging to everyone. Burdock is a weed, you're a weed here on the forum too. If I were the moderators, I'd pull you out by the roots and send you to the bathhouse for a month. To give you a rest.