How to make giant profits on forex? - page 51
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah, it's a dangerous business, but it's also profitable if you know how. Of course, the exchange will not be rolled in asphalt, so it becomes even more attractive than the casino.
It turns out that a coin may win another coin, but a little more algorithmic? Or what to call it I do not know
That's another interesting thing here. Usually a negative connotation is associated with the words 'gambler, casino player'. Such people are considered, like junkies, to be incompetent. But Alexander showed that with a clear head a gambler can prosper).
purely mathematically the bets are equal on the handicap and the Eagle :))) look ...
Handle - lots 1-1 (ie the sum is already 2) -2 (sum 4), etc. and on Eagle 1 (got a profit 1) then bet 2 transactions got a profit2 - then bet 4, etc.
Thereby the profit of the first deal is *5 times more than the same in eagle/river.-
but the result they have the same total on eagle and handicap 5 knees will give a return of 1 to 31... at the same risk to lose only 1
I get it now. Thank you.
I played with pyramiding in the tester. The initial entry was made either by pressing the button on the EA control panel or by setting the trend direction using the panel switch, and the entry was made when the extremum of the last completed candle was broken. The expert buildsa pyramid and sets and modifies the stop-losses. Profit closing was done manually using the panel button. I have got such thoughts from the experience. If we want the total loss of the pyramid to be approximately equal to the loss of the first order without pyramiding when the stop is triggered, the stop should be approximately equal to the order grid interval equal to 12 points (as recommended by Alexander) . To get at least some effect from the pyramid, you should wait until the second order at least reaches profit. But this small stoploss often triggers the order closing the pyramid or the first single order with a loss. And it is possible to wait for three or more orders to trigger only in cases when the price, as they say, triggers. This means that the pyramid can work only if the initial entrance is made very precisely and the price makes a shot without pullbacks or with very small pullbacks. Well, there is another variant if we make stops larger but in case of a pyramid the increase of stop loss leads to a considerable growth of loss at its triggering.
The "sniper" strategy comes to mind as well. When profit obtained in a certain transaction is used to increase the lot for the next transaction in which the stop loss is calculated so that in case of its triggering total losses of two transactions were equal to zero. Maybe such variant is more profitable than pyramiding. But there will also be the problem of accurate entries. I need to think. Maybe I am doing something wrong?
I played with pyramiding in the tester. The initial entry was made either by pressing the button on the EA control panel or by setting the trend direction using the panel switch, and the entry was made when the extremum of the last completed candle was broken. The expert buildsa pyramid and sets and modifies the stop-losses. Profit closing was done manually using the panel button. I have got such thoughts from the experience. If we want the total loss of the pyramid to be approximately equal to the loss of the first order without pyramiding when the stop is triggered, the stop should be approximately equal to the order grid interval equal to 12 points (as recommended by Alexander) . To get at least some effect from the pyramid, you should wait until the second order at least reaches profit. But this small stoploss often triggers the order closing the pyramid or the first single order with a loss. And it is possible to wait for three or more orders to trigger only in cases when the price, as they say, triggers. This means that the pyramid can work only if the initial order is implemented very precisely and the price makes a strike without pullbacks or with very small pullbacks. Well, there is another variant if we make stops larger but in case of a pyramid the increasing of stop loss leads to a considerable growth of loss at its triggering.
The "sniper" strategy comes to mind as well. When profit obtained in a certain transaction is used to increase the lot for the next transaction in which the stop loss is calculated so that in case of its triggering total losses of two transactions were equal to zero. Maybe such variant is more profitable than pyramiding. But there will also be the problem of accurate entries. I need to think. Maybe I am doing something wrong?
You have to take into account that there is no spread in a coin.
Now calculate the spread from each of the 57,000 throws.
"Here's an example of a one-handed version: the maximum lot gain of 8192 was achieved on 8600 coin tosses. Profit after 57000 coin tosses was 27000"
Perhaps the profit turns out to be the unaccounted spread.
I have to think. Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
Do you use patterns in your trading?
Do you use patterns in your trading?
In EAs, yes, they do.
In EAs, yes, they are used.
Are they graphical patterns ?
Are these graphical patterns ?
Mostly fractal patterns and candlestick extrema of different TFs are used.
The patterns used are mostly fractals and candlestick extrema of different TFs.
That is why I ask, I try to use and investigate graphical patterns.
If we take for example daily candlesticks in my patterns, the identification of the pattern goes according to some triggering condition,
1) let's say 5-6 days of falling without interruption (trigger condition),
2) then we get several days of consolidation or sideways movement,
3) then it goes down again and
4) then an upward movement.
So on each phase I have a high probability of anticipating the nature of price movement, i.e. I know, for example, that after point 4 there is a relatively flat movement upwards with small reversals, where I can effectively use pyramiding.
Have you tried exploring this?