Uladzimir Izerski page - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Mikhail, let's say we take your considerations as a basis.
For example, let it be not 1, 2, 3, but 10 points.
How many trends will you calculate during the day?
But actually the trend, as Sergey rightly says, is indeed the main direction of the movement.
Don't you think there's some inconsistency in your reasoning?
Renat, what kind of discrepancy are we talking about?
Based on my statement, the Renko chart shows trends. After all, there are no flats on the Renco, where the cube size is exactly the threshold.
Gentlemen, we need to speak the same language in order to agree on something.
To do this, I suggest, for starters, choosing a specific TF. Talk only about it. "Forget" about the existence of all the other TFs.
Watching prices on the financial markets, I have come to the conclusion that trend-finding has become irrelevant these days. It is more important now to see the channels in which the price is ready to move. For example, a flat is a horizontal channel. It does not differ from the up channel or the down channel. It is better to pay more attention to the channels instead of obsessing over dividing into trend-flat.
And the trend itself is recognisable by the alternation of tops and troughs in price. You don't have to invent anything new. Everything has been invented before us.
I just woke up and decided to make a morning (12:00 noon) toilet :-) So, I'm sitting and thinking and another idea concerning the trend occurred to me. Since quoting is changed by ticks, the following definition of a trend is as follows
The presence of a trend occurs when some ticks prevail over others (we mean ticks up and ticks down) What? А?
I just woke up and decided to make a morning (12:00 noon) toilet :-) So, I'm sitting and thinking and another idea concerning the trend occurred to me. Since quoting is changed by ticks, the following definition of a trend is as follows
The presence of a trend occurs when some ticks prevail over others (we mean ticks up and ticks down) What? А?
It would not be a trend but a wave. Or a ZZ knee, for that matter.
I just woke up and decided to make a morning (12:00 noon) toilet :-) So, I'm sitting and thinking and another idea concerning the trend occurred to me. Since quoting is changed by ticks, the following definition of a trend is as follows
The presence of a trend occurs when some ticks prevail over others (we mean ticks up and ticks down) What? А?
Here in the morning, always a good idea ;)
I used to do that too.
It turned out cool, but....
it's not.
The timeframe is totally irrelevant and has nothing to do with the trend. Whether it's minutes or hours....
You're looking right in the water there.
Keep thinking, you're thinking the right way.
♪ I'm not gonna tell you what to do ♪
nograils are given out.
Renat, what kind of inconsistency are we talking about?
Based on my assertion, the Renko chart does show trends. After all, there are no flats on the Renko, where the size of the cube is exactly the threshold.
It doesn't matter at all
It's not the chart that determines the trend.
It doesn't matter at all.
The trend is not determined by the chart
Completely agree with you colleague :-)
It's in the soul, you have to feel it :-)
Totally agree with you colleague :-)
not in the shower ;)
demand, supply...
it comes from there
a graph will only confirm