![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Welcome to court, only a court can pronounce a guilty verdict.
If the client is in some Brit. Jurisdiction, he could very well sue.
The rules of Freelance are violatedhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules:
1.12. If the conditions for the transfer of the exclusive rights to the program created by order through Freelance service are not separately stipulated in the Terms of Reference, the exclusive rights to this program created by order belong to the Customer. In this case, the Contractor can use the created program for its own needs under a royalty-free simple (non-exclusive) licence for the duration of the exclusive right.
Geez. Very funny ) Oil Freelance tycoons are fighting for the gold mine, not sparing their competitors and not choosing their methods. A hundred years from now they'll make a Freelance movie about the first steps of the future masters of the world ))
Nevertheless, it has happened here.
If the client's in some Brit. Jurisdiction, he might as well file.
Let him submit it))
The rules of Freelance are violatedhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules:
1.12. If the conditions for the transfer of the exclusive rights to the program created by order through Freelance service are not separately stipulated in the Terms of Reference, the exclusive rights to this program created by order belong to the Customer. In this case, the Contractor may use the created program for its own use under a free simple (non-exclusive) license for the duration of the exclusive rights.
and there, in continuation - VII.10.
a shovel is a pity((.
It's so interesting how things have turned out. TC wanted the best, but it turned out to be the same as always. In order to prove that he was right and justice prevailed, he could even break a couple of rules in public )
...and as always, all the forum members write their own comments without reading anything that has already been written in the thread.
In such situations you should not leave the customer alone, with yourself, for you have what you have. In any business, it's the arrangement that rules, not the subject of the deal.
On the other side, you can see that you are an adult and not a schoolboy, and you can always find a compromise. For TC, on the contrary, I have the opinion that he has not had enough life experience.
But TC insist in his rightness and exclusivity, and ready to kill himself for ten quid, not wanting to help the customer with his own product. It takes five minutes, to find out the cause and eliminate the defect,
or explain the possible cause, so the man himself to solve it, if it is identified on the side of the customer.
But TC considers himself right, it is not typical to work with the client to make him happy, and he asked to come back next time to you, but not to someone else.
That is, TC works for once, not thinking about regular customers, it confirms that not enough life experience yet.
The flaw may not necessarily be in the code, it may be in the unsolved issue. In this case I think the review is well deserved.
That is my opinion.