Why did the rating change? - page 17
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
People love freebies, though.
This is not a freebie, but a fee for the development of the resource.
The forum is already quite developed and well promoted. This is why they probably decided that the fee would be unnecessary.
The forum is already sufficiently developed and well promoted. This is probably why they decided that the fee would be unnecessary.
There is a very developed degree of flooding and fooling naive Market customers. You won't find a single topic of interest without a mountain of flubber. There's 90% meaningless dumb crap on Market
There's a very advanced degree of flubbing and fooling naive Market shoppers. You can't find a single topic of interest without a mountain of flubber. There's 90% meaningless dumb crap on Market.
And you don't flub. The topic is about rating and you bring in floods and Market. :)
It's not a freebie, it's payment for the development of the resource.
GENTLEMEN, AREN'T YOU ASHAMED?
killing marketplace statistics is evil; it is something that should not happen on any normal site.
Shaming and demanding the continuation of freebies, which are originally a gesture of goodwill and not an obligation, is shameful.
Whether there are bonuses or not, we will know when someone who has been cut reaches their old rating.
If there are bonuses, fine, if not, fine.
You call it cleaning up the bases. We call it an unfair partnership.
Our activity on this site brings you a lot of profit, some of which used to be paid to us in the form of bonuses.
So you and we were partners. But at some point you decided that you could just ignore us - the partners.
on October 25 you stopped paying bonuses and cut the ratings, simply destroying a significant part of our reputation and our contribution to the development of the resource.
October 28 first information from you: "Due to an error the ratings have changed, we will fix it tomorrow...".
December 17 second information from you: "We conducted a database cleanup and, unfortunately, the rating will not be restored.
It took you 50 days to deceive us and so unconvincingly explain the reason for what happened.
GENTLEMEN, AREN'T YOU ASHAMED?
They are not ashamed...
It is now obvious that this whole ugly thing with the so-called cleaning of the bases was carried out for the sole purpose of stopping the payment of bonuses.
Nobody was bothered by the ratings - they were deliberately cut for this very purpose.
When excessive greed and deceit prevail over conscience, there is no shame.