Let's build a mini grail!? - page 11
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Second chart.
A 30% drawdown and not much profit... It's weak))
Do you consider +400% per month with a 30% drawdown as the word "weak" ?))
In general, I don't think the profit percentage is important yet ... what matters is the algorithm, the very essence of understanding how to do it, and then you can afford to think about the percentage of profit.Citizens speculators, you are confused in three pines and confuse others. There are two ways to make money on forex, 1 see the market and know how to trade, 2 forex = casino, the ability to trade is not needed, you just need to beat the casino - if I understand correctly, this is the second option under discussion. If the second option is being discussed, then why use the words trend and flat? To get an answer to the question, you need to formulate it correctly, instead of piling everything up. Everything that was said above is known to everyone and it does not work. It's so superficial that it has almost nothing to do with the case - that's why it doesn't work.
:-)
But you can get a lot of adrenaline!
Initial risk of 1%, TP three times the stop; after stop loss, triple the risk. 4 misses in a row and depo goes to 0, but up to this wonderful moment grow 3%/trade. 30-40 trades without series failure - the depo is doubled
Machine learning - neural networks. Rubbish. They underlearn, then they overlearn)). Rubbish. It's just an attempt of programmers to shrug off the responsibility of trading to the black box. That's bullshit.
No, it's the opposite of what you say, you have a problem statement that is either fraudulent or novice. Those who are experts in the field know that without a statistically significant forecast, some future indicators of the market, you can only fool yourself or gullible investors, for which you can then lose your health and even life, there are already such precedents. Lot manipulation, and in general any money management, can only change the dynamics of SLIVE, stretch it to infinity, but certainly not to transform the strategy on random inputs into profitable, it's like an eternal engine, it's not possible in principle, mathematically, you know,MA-TE-MA-THESKY! So do not bullshit in front of the esteemed ladies and gentlemen. Get your lost 10 years studying matan, linagle, theorist, statics, MO, etc. and get involved in normal quantum analytics, not in tales of overfitting and deposit overclocking. If not, then go back to working for daddy, what were you doing there, delivering pizzas, or working in a call centre....
:-)
But you can get a lot of adrenaline!
Initial risk is 1%, TP is three times the stop; after the stop loss, the risk is tripled. 4 misses in a row and depo goes to 0, but up to this wonderful moment we go up 3%/trade. 30-40 trades without series failure - the depo is doubled
You can double the deposit for 2, 3 trades. These trades will happen (according to the system), within one hour approximately (or faster). The system is based on patterns that work in 90% of cases. Only recently figured out how to achieve 90%. The remaining 10% is still a mystery. Whatever. 90 is OK ))
It is possible to double the deposit in 2,3 trades. These trades will happen (according to the system), within one hour approximately (or faster). The system is based on patterns that work in 90% of cases. Only recently figured out how to achieve 90%. The remaining 10% is still a mystery. Whatever. 90 is fine ))
No not true, 90% is either overfitting or errors in backtesting logic or peeking. The risk at which you can double in 2.3 trades is FATAL (for the depo if on your own, or for life if on investor's).
You are either newbies or crooks, which do you choose?
No it isn't, 90% is either overfitting or mistakes in backtesting logic or peeking. The risk of doubling in 2.3 trades is FATAL (for the deposit if on your own, or for life if on an investor's).
You are either newbies or crooks, what's your choice?
Why jump on a person like that?
No it isn't, 90% is either overfitting or mistakes in backtesting logic or peeking. The risk of doubling in 2.3 trades is FATAL (for the deposit if on your own, or for life if on an investor's).
Record you either novices or cheaters, what do you choose?
Put yourself in the category of fools. If you can't come up with such a system, it's your problem. Don't judge others by yourself.
---------
Give me at least one pattern in the market smarty-pants.
Put yourself in the category of fools. If you can't think of such a system, that's your problem. Don't judge others by yourself.
---------
Give me at least one pattern in the market smarty-pants.
Maybe there's a state? I don't.
Actually there is a pattern - a lot of people think they have found a pattern)
Maybe there's a state? I don't believe so.
In general there is a pattern - a lot of people think they have found a pattern)
I don't understand why the system works and almost all orders are closed at take, but everything crashes. Maybe, after programming it will not be 90%, maybe a bit more, maybe less, but it suits me fine.
I do not believe it - it's up to my business. Do not believe in Thomas.
Generally there is a pattern - a lot of people think they have found a pattern)
When you find a pattern. you don't talk about it - it's bad luck.