Let's build a mini grail!? - page 10

New comment
 
<br/ translate="no">

If anyone can give me such an advisor or a proven algorithm (not an idea), I will make a mini grail on this basis. Which would give me about... I don't know, on average, maybe 20% safe enough profit per month. And maybe even a hundred percent a month will come out...

There are such "mini-Grails" in Market now, but they have only one problem - they don't give profit every month, or else they sink all their depo or depo+ earnings...

 
Martin Cheguevara:

let me guess - new systems -> magic_order_buy++;magic_order_sell++; =)

I've done this kind of thing before, but not now.

But all the same 20% profit is almost guaranteed from losses that are guaranteed to be covered - it's already pretty good)

Nah, it's more complicated than that. And alternating buy-sell is not always necessary. Sometimes an additional sell system may be created on a falling trend. That is, the direction of trading is not important, what is important is that the market becomes flat. So there is always a scale, on which the market has a certain degree of flatness.
This is in general terms. There are many subtleties, but it looks like yours.
 
Martin Cheguevara:

what if the conditions are more than six months practically non-existent and the word "inside" is just irrelevant?)

Even on such a trend there is a rollback scale, it's just very small. Plus we need an algorithm that will not open a buy at the very top, but will optimally follow the trend and open when the trend ends.
 
Maxim Romanov:
Even on such a trend, there is a rollback scale, it's just very small. Plus we need an algorithm that will not open a buy at the very top, but will optimally follow the trend and open when the trend is over.

well again you have a small ~5-10% probability of a strong reverse fast and large trend working against your algorithm...

i.e. you are guaranteed to lose money on some process...or rather on a strong trend...

in my opinion the strength of the grail should be precisely the inability of the market to go constantly and a strong trend and a strong flat. In the market it is either one or the other)

and the robot should be able to make money on one or the other.

 
Igor Yeremenko:

I've got such "mini-granals" in the market now, but the only problem with them is that they don't give profits every month, or else they lose all their depo or depo+earnings...

Can you give me a hint? ))

 
Martin Cheguevara:

this is what a grail should look like.

The question is, of course, that I don't know how or what it is based on.


The second graph.

The drawdown is 30% and the profit is small... It's not so good))

 
Martin Cheguevara:

well again you have a small ~5-10% probability of a strong reverse fast and large trend working against your algorithm...

i.e. you are guaranteed to lose money on some process...or rather on a strong trend...

in my opinion the strength of the grail should be precisely the inability of the market to go constantly and a strong trend and a strong flat. In the market it is either one or the other)

And the robot should be able to make money on one or the other.

Yes, it is there, sometimes you have to wait a long time for it to work out. But this problem can be solved in 2 ways.
1-Tracking the current trends on different scales and selecting the optimal scale for a flat trade
2-Customize the tracking of trends for specific scales (not to buy right at the top)
The task seems not complicated and it is clear what needs to be done. But ... not easy to engineer.
Ideally, to make a switch, when to trade a trend, when to trade a flat, but I'm not ready yet.

 
Михаил:

Second chart.

A 30% drawdown and not much profit... Weakly))

The main thing is to have it and justify it, the rest is not so important.
 
Citizens speculators, you are confused in three pines and confuse others. There are two ways to make money on forex, 1 see the market and know how to trade, 2 forex = casino, the ability to trade is not needed, you just need to beat the casino - if I understand correctly, here we are discussing the second option. If the second option is being discussed, then why use the words trend and flat? To get an answer to the question, you need to formulate it correctly, instead of piling everything up. Everything that was said above is known to everyone and it does not work. It's so superficial that it has almost nothing to do with the case - that's why it does not work.
 
The easiest TS is to open orders in the right direction ) ) don't close orders in deficit ) ) )
1...34567891011121314151617...36
New comment