Points VS Pips - page 92

New comment
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

A second, yes. But it's not measured in seconds, it's measured as accurately as possible in divisions, i.e. in points.

no-no-no)
this is where divisions are added for the accuracy of the quotes

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

no-no-no)
this is where the divisions are added for the accuracy of the quotes

In most cases, it's completely unclear what you're trying to say.

 
Artyom Trishkin:

Don't piss me off. I'm very patient. But...

A second is a second. But in a second there will be 10 points - the minimum change in time. Now, at the smallest possible shift of one second, there is one point in one second.

now yes, but tomorrow the clock will be more accurate, in 0.1-second increments)
and 1 second will equal 0.1 second - that's your analogy.

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

So there is a point_mt (whole) and there is a standard point (fractional)?
so there are two different items?

Well, I assumed that adding the adjective "standard point/pip" to the terms "point" and "pip" -- would lead you into a new cycle of questions.

I'm worried about you, hang in there.

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

Right now, yes, but tomorrow the clock will be more accurate, in 0.1-second increments)
and 1 second will equal 0.1 second.

Not a second but a division on the scale.

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

In most cases it is completely unclear what you are trying to say.

Read the previous comments:

It turns out that if the clock starts shifting at 0.1 sec (instead of 1 sec), then 1 second becomes 0.1 second?

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:

It's not a second, it's a division on the scale.

That's what I'm talking about.)

the scale division has no effect on the point (second)

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

We were talking about English-language terms.)
and you're using the russian language.

The main thing here is to understand where there is left and where there is right. The original point is that the point = 1, it is indivisible, so the points are on the left.
And all fractions are to the right of the comma. And they're called pips.

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

that's what I'm talking about)

the division of the scale has no effect on the point (second)

A division is a point. The second has its own name and is called the second.

Why would a second be called a point if it already has a name?

 
Taras Slobodyanik:

Now it is, but tomorrow the clock will be more accurate, in 0.1 second increments)
and 1 second will become 0.1 second - that's your analogy

I don't have that analogy - it's your ideas about simple things that tell you.

I'm trying to explain to you that a point is the minimum division of the scale as Dimitri already told you above.

A second will not become different by changing the accuracy scale. But there will be exactly as many points in one second as the accuracy of the second is increased by.

It sounds like you are just trolling.

1...858687888990919293949596979899...169
New comment