Points VS Pips - page 44

 
Vladimir Baskakov:
You wouldn't know, it depends on the lot. But your competitors have statistics in this way, which is quite informative
What is the practical point of monitoring in points?
 
Artyom Trishkin:
What is the practical meaning of point-based monitoring?
Informative. You can see at a glance how much you've done. In Zulu, by the way, the prerogative of the points
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
Informative. It's easy to see how much you've done. In Zulu too, by the way, in the prerogative of points
Where can you see the consistency of the lot, without which it makes no sense?
 
Artyom Trishkin:
Where do you see the consistency of the lot, without which this makes no sense?
Yes, the lot is important here. It's probably an average.
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
Yes, the lot is important here. Probably the average.
I.e., monitoring at points does not give a picture of the real state of the frozen TS.
Why then is such monitoring preferable on the services you mentioned?
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
Yeah, the lot's important. I'm guessing it's an average.
Average hospital temperature?
And how do you know which bill is already cold and which is on the verge of cellular destruction?
 
Artyom Trishkin:
I.e., monitoring at points does not give a picture of the real condition of the frozen vehicle.
Why then is such monitoring preferable to the services you mentioned?
Not only pips, all other indicators are there too. But the number of pips, drawdown and lifetime are in the tops. These criteria are
 
Artyom Trishkin:
Why then is such monitoring preferable on the services you mentioned?

Perhaps they are idiots ) I take it this word is not an insult, because Fedoseyev is using it left and right

 
TheXpert:

They must be idiots ) I take it this word is not an insult, because Fedoseyev uses it left and right

All for the time being.
I don't like any kind of personal attacks.
 
Artyom Trishkin:
It's all for the time being.
I don't like any kind of personal attacks.

And there's no end to being stupid, is there?