The most banal trading strategy - page 37
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Please note your audusd picture and mine from before, both open up and down and swap is negative on both
comment on
I know... what is there to comment on. I just wrote out the swaps from the symbol specification.
And I know... what's there to comment on. I just wrote out the swaps from the symbol specification.
Note your picture of the audusd and mine from before, both open up and down and both have negative swaps.
comment on
You deliberately chose a pair with negative swap!
And I know... what's there to comment on. I just wrote out the swaps from the symbol specification.
The only person who turned out to be able to at least ask the obvious question....I'm not prepared to give an answer... (c)
The question belonged to the method of decomposition of a signal of price difference and SMA, that is R, on its components: always positive Rup, and always negative Rdw. And it has nothing to do with what you're talking about (the connection between R prediction and the price prediction). The relationship between the forecast R and the price forecast I have given many above in explicit form (in the form of a simple formula). Once again you have said something stupid, and you don't even apologise.
why?
To see clearly, check your data sheet to see if you have different data there.
By the way, if you add absolutely accurate prediction, thenMaxim Kuznetsov is right.
Well, you're in your repertoire - absolutely accurate and forecasting are two mutually exclusive things. Because predictions are by definition probabilistic.
At first I thought it was you who re-logged in under Isakov's nickname...
You deliberately chose a pair with a negative swap!
The person's question concerned the way of decomposing the signal of price difference and SMA, i.e. R, into components: always positive Rup, and always negative Rdw. And it (the question) has nothing to do with what you're talking about (the connection between R prediction and the price prediction). The relationship between the forecast R and the price forecast I have given many above in explicit form (in the form of a simple formula). Once again you have said something stupid, and you don't even apologise.
There is no connection and there never was. And since these two values are included in the original "formula" - it is just a set of symbols
Thank you, most can't even Google it, apparently.
Please build an example of a ring with a positive total swap.