Alternatives to paM accounts ? which is better - page 4

New comment
 
Ilya Malev:

Have you ever heard of adjusting position volumes? MT5 (in netting mode) is designed for such trading and there are no problems with adjustment.

What does netting have to do with it? We are talking about the constantly changing volume of investments. If you deposit 1000 and take 2000, you have to count everything, calculate the optimal lot, etc.
 
Vladimir Baskakov:
This has nothing to do with netting . It's about the constantly changing volume of investment . 1000 deposited 2000 withdrawn, you have to count everything, calculate the optimum lot, etc.

This is a programmers' forum, shame on you, an elementary problem solved in the case of "sudden withdrawal" without a penny of cost at all.

 
Anastasia Vasilenko:
What is better for an investor in a PAMM account or a signal?

If you want to make money on a PAMM as a manager you'll need tens of millions of dollars for a similar monthly profit)...
for example, there is a signal with 2000 subscribers ... each pays 40 per month ... that's $80 000 ... minus the service fee of 20% ...
the total of 64,000 dollars a month whether you have profit on the signal or not ...
Consider the situation with UXF accounts ...
for example, you have $ 5,000,000 in investments (which was only once in Alpari's history)
you take 30% of the profit ... for the month you earned 5% of 5,000,000 = 250,000 divided by 30% = 75,000
but you try to collect that much investment)...


You get two in one!
You get two in one! It's not easy to copy the signal... you need the same broker ... because copying can be substantially different ... while registering with each broker for each signal (if you sign up then and there for different signals) is a very difficult task and a waste of time ... because every time you have to verify and collect receipts!

 
Anastasia Vasilenko:
yes yes there is a resource other than alps ?

there's more than one...

 
Georgiy Merts:

The main difference between a PAMM and a signal - in a PAMM, the owner must make a profit. In a signal, profit is not important, the most important thing is subscribers. The owner of PAMM is interested that his account should show profit in real trading, at least for some time. For a signal provider, it is enough to show profit on a REAL trade.

what do you mean, it's not important?
if the signal will not show a profit for a long time, the subscribers will start to unsubscribe!
is it not logical?
is the same with PAMM accounts... if the account will give 2% a year ALL INVESTORS WILL DIE!
and the signal and even more so because you need to pay a monthly subscription!

 
Well, this is beginning to sound like talk in the style of saying the word "sugar" and see how sweet your mouth becomes at once. You try to make some money from the signal.
 
Ilya Malev:

This is a programmers' forum, shame on you, an elementary problem solved in the case of "sudden withdrawal" without a penny of cost at all.

Tell that to 90% of the topicstarters
 
Pavel Malyshko:

there's more than one...

Anton knows best

 
Vladimir Baskakov:
Tell that to 90% of the topikestars

I say this regularly to 90% of the various "topicstarters"

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

What does it mean?

Your capital is 1,000, investors come in with 100 and one with 20,000. Enter the market as usual at 2% of the deposit. The biggest investor decides to take a capital of 20,000.

What is your drawdown and risk?

and what is your drawdown???
for example you lose $2,000 by 10%.
The investor withdraws 18,000.
you are left with 900!
go to see more about PAMMs)
The funds are divided proportionally)
The manager of the account will not lose more interest than the investor himself ... everyone loses the same!

12345678910
New comment