Time of writing the advisor - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
My scalper only has SLs and TPs in case of nuclear war, the robot closes on its own, I don't even ask it anymore. In general, complex TPs are nonsense. I've seen a lot of them in my life.
I won't forget one hot Estonian guy, who wanted to display about 2000 settings, out of which 1950 were absolutely useless. When I told him that it's not technically possible, I got one answer - you're a great programmer, come up with an idea.
I said to him - Matty, you have a naked martin in your strategy, you will soon and inevitably sell your $40,000! You have to think not about the beauty on the screen, but about how not to get lost. Better buy yourself a tractor in a farm and forget about forex. He was a farmer then, no higher education and generally maths at multiplication table level.
- You don't understand, the more I lose the more I win later, that's such an Estonian wisdom! We retreat first, then we always win!
I don't think there's any need to state the bottom line. It all turned out to be the Russians' fault, that is me personally. Forty tons down the drain.
----------------
Keep it simple. I'm working on some tricks and I'm slowly pulling the scalper up from Monday till yesterday's Thursday, 4 days. It's a bummer, but if I can get some stability I'll get something. Real.
But guys, I often wonder why we are fidgeting in this forex, do we really...
My scalper only has SLs and TPs in case of nuclear war, the robot closes on its own, I don't even ask it anymore. In general, complex TPs are nonsense. I've seen a lot of them in my life.
I won't forget one hot Estonian guy, who wanted to display about 2000 settings, out of which 1950 were absolutely useless. When I told him that it's not technically possible, I got one answer - you're a great programmer, come up with an idea.
I said to him - Matty, you have a naked martin in your strategy, you will soon and inevitably sell your $40,000! You have to think not about the beauty on the screen, but about how not to get lost. Better buy yourself a tractor in a farm and forget about forex. He was a farmer then, no higher education and generally maths at multiplication table level.
- You don't understand, the more I lose the more I win later, that's such an Estonian wisdom! We retreat first, then we always win!
I don't think there's any need to state the bottom line. It all turned out to be the Russians' fault, that is me personally. Forty tons down the drain.
----------------
Keep it simple. I'm working on some tricks and I'm slowly pulling the scalper up from Monday till yesterday's Thursday, 4 days. It's a bummer, but if I can get some stability I'll get something. Real.
But guys, I often wonder why we are jumping around in this Forex market.
Why do they say - everything is simple.)
Quite a good chart, if you can make it stable, then it's quite a working system)
It's good day, I have a question for those who write EAs professionally. We have ordered a mechanics trading EA from a programmer; he has seen the Terms of Reference and said it is complicated, first time encountered, but solvable.
I am telling my companions that it's just delaying time, (because I ordered a simple owl from the programmer, even though I'm not a specialist in mql, but even I am a nubik saw that he really knows what to do and how to do and made me it for 4 hours), and people with whom we bid on it, believe that he works honestly.Vot and decided to appeal to people who earn that and know how to write an owl of any complexity, what would either make sure that we are not diluted, or on the reverse to prove to his companions that I am right.
P.S. give the terms of reference I can not, but the owl is a complex mechanics-based, I'm more than sure that such an adviser has not done. I know that there is little information and complexity of the robot you do not see that to say unequivocally, just wanted to know whether you had to kill half a year in robots of this complexity.Thanks in advance
Purely as a matter of interest, how did it end? Or is it still hanging?
They say it's all brilliantly simple for a reason.)
I have already said many times - the effectiveness of the TS does not depend on its complexity. The simplest and the most complex TS can work with equal probability.
I've said many times before: the effectiveness of the TS does not depend at all on its complexity. The simplest and the most complicated TS can work with equal probability.
In other words, they are the same bows on their shoelaces, just tied differently.
My scalper only has SL and TP in case of nuclear war, the robot closes on its own somehow, I don't even ask him anymore. In general, complex TPs are nonsense. I've seen a lot of them in my life.
I won't forget one hot Estonian guy, who wanted to display about 2000 settings, out of which 1950 were absolutely useless. When I told him that it's not technically possible, I got one answer - you're a great programmer, come up with an idea.
I said to him - Matty, you have a naked martin in your strategy, you'll soon and inevitably sell your $40,000! You have to think not about the beauty on the screen, but about how not to get lost. Better buy yourself a tractor in a farm and forget about forex. He was a farmer then, no higher education and generally maths at multiplication table level.
- You don't understand, the more I lose the more I win later, that's such an Estonian wisdom! We retreat first, then we always win!
I don't think there's any need to state the bottom line. It all turned out to be the Russians' fault, that is me personally. Forty tons down the drain.
----------------
Keep it simple. I'm working on some tricks and I'm slowly pulling the scalper up from Monday till yesterday's Thursday, 4 days. It's a bummer, but if I can get some stability I'll get something. Real.
And you guys, I often wonder why we are fidgeting in this forex, do we really...
I do not have a single indicator, there are local highs / lows in the zone to trade, 2 TF to trade, the older that shows where the junior one is trading at the moment, the change in the senior is determined by one algorithm.In juniors it is different, and has a junior such a thing called the transfer zones, it's kind of simple to explain, formed a zone, then the price returned to it and left after updating the maximum/minimum BUT the transfer is carried out on the third TF on m5, that is, the zone on n1, but it is transferred to the price of m5,I don't think I've done it because I've got a lot of experience in writing robots but I've got a very good view of them and I'm convinced that they are easy to use because I'm convinced that they are easy to use and I'm not an expert at all because I think they are hard to use. And if I were a programmer I wouldn't have asked that question.
I think it would be much easier to explain if you send your terms of reference, and then you would be given a concrete answer whether you are cheated or not)
There is a strategy, you need to write an advisor
Need to create a job in the Freelance service.
We need to freelance section to write TOR from the customer's words.
If you clearly explain in words what we need, it remains only to apply it to the "geography of the schedule".
I've always been pretty good with reasoning logic. Perhaps, with enough understanding of strategy, I could apply all this to graphics.
+++ 90% of customers are unable to write even the simplest terms of reference
They often send me a drawing on a piece of paper with pictures taken with a mobile phone, I write the TOR in Google Docs, and then we correct it together.