Market and products (experts) without monitoring. - page 20
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The robot may get into the trend, but in the test how?
Who needs a tester when there is real-time monitoring).
Buyers are disappointed with the tester's readings. Now some people need REBOOT to "chop" on this scheme.
Maybe the robot will get into the trend, but in the test how?
By the way, nothing prevents you from putting two strategies into one robot. One is a tester grail and the other is for real trading.
Do you realise that in order to make a couple of thousand dollars from a customer, you need to show them three months of profitability on a cent real?
How do you do that?
Open a dozen cent accounts and put a robot on them.
Which one? - The kind that trades on the upside.
How to do it?
You need to decrease the number of opened deals. - So increase the time frame. The less often he trades, the less he loses in 3 months.
You should not rely only on one robot. So, you have to put several similar ones with different settings and on different symbols. One of them will surely hit the trend and work.
Further, the robot should be immediately placed on the market.
Where is the heresy here? It is a normal working scheme.
Of course it is heresy.
1. Sellers are always looking for strategies that will trade profitably over the long term. It doesn't matter whether trend/flat/scalping or grid strategies.
2. Monitoring is online, and you will not know in advance which "MAK" settings will show good returns for a given period. You cannot change them all the time, you will still see the moment of publication.
3. usually EAs are set up at the same time as the start of monitoring.... in any case, the buyers "right away" will not jump to the Expert Advisors, showing good rates of return, even for 6 months, especially for $ 2000
4) Moreover, nobody will buy a robot, if it trades once every six months. Who wants to wait so long for results? The robot does not trade every month, and you think how to fix it without increasing risks.
Of course it is heresy.
1. Sellers are always looking for strategies that will trade in the long term in the long run. It doesn't matter whether trend/float/scalping or grid trading.
2. Monitoring is online, and you will not know in advance which "MAK" settings will show good returns for a given period. You cannot change them all the time, you will still see the moment of publication.
3. usually EAs are set up at the same time as the start of monitoring.... in any case, the buyers "right away" will not jump to the Expert Advisors, showing good rates of return, even for 6 months, especially for $ 2000
4) Moreover, nobody will buy a robot, if it trades once every six months. Who wants to wait so long for results? The robot does not trade every month, and you think how to fix it without increasing risks.
2. several cent accounts are opened. And observers do not know how and what trades on them.
3. You can put a robot up for sale whenever you want. And disappointed buyers are sure to pounce if the new market is advertised to them.
4. The time frame can be increased to H1 and there will be so many trades that it will not sell quickly. Disguise it with words about a wise trend/fleet strategy.
The dust in the eyes from monitoring a real account, against the backdrop of tester grails will work. People will take it.
So much for "real" monitoring.
Quite affordable for a mediocre scammer.
2. several cent accounts are opened. And observers do not know how or what is being traded on them.
3. You can put the robot up for sale whenever you want. And disappointed buyers are sure to pounce if the new market is advertised to them.
4. The time frame can be increased to H1 and there will be so many trades that it will not sell quickly. Disguise it with words about a wise trend/fleet strategy.
The dust in the eyes from monitoring a real account, against the backdrop of tester grails will work. People will take it.
So much for "real" monitoring.
Pretty much within the reach of a mediocre scammer.
Do you even trade on your own?
Do you trade on your own at all?
No. I understand the market too well for that).
No. I understand the market too well for that).
Of course it's heresy.
...
2. Monitoring is online, and you can't know in advance which "MAK" settings will show good returns for a given period. You can't change them all the time, you can still see the moment they are published.
...
There is no need to find out in advance. You launch 10 robots of the same type on 10 cent accounts and on different pairs at once. You wait for 3 months. If there is the best robot with the yield due to hitting the trend, put it in the Market and immediately bring the statistics for the real account. But before that, remove monitoring of other trading robots. In order to avoid suspicions.