Record on the Market - page 35
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are different users. Around Market there is a crowd of spoilt slackers looking for the grail. But we are also identifying who is coming to us to buy. Serious traders will be interested in Expert Advisors with many settings. They will appreciate their practicality. Stupid lazybones - never.
The question is - who do we want to work for?
You need to publish a couple of your products in the Market, and then you'll understand everything.
The way you think it should be like this, or better like this - it won't work!
You think that one or two people will buy a piano with a mountain of settings and you'll blow your brains out like 1,000 people!
1 out of 100 products in the Market shoots, and there is no guarantee that it will be a super piano with a mountain of settings, for which the trader will be responsible.
You need to publish a couple of your products in the Market and then you will see for yourself
The way you think you need it and the better way - it won't work!
One or two people will buy a piano with a mountain of settings, but you'll blow your brains out like 1,000
1 out of 100 products in the Market shoots, and there is no guarantee that it will be a super piano with a mountain of settings, for which the trader will be responsible.
If you're right, our road is short. You cannot endlessly churn out tester's grails and hope for demand. Sooner or later it will die out.
It shoots 1 in 100 ...
The same can be said for the signals
If you are right, our road is short. After all, it is impossible to claw tester grails endlessly and hope for demand. Sooner or later, it will die out.
It will not fade 100%. The main thing is to develop in this direction.
It won't go away 100%. The main thing is to evolve in this direction.
How? By riveting more?
How? Rivet more?
Exactly, to be on trend. to trade - to develop and come up with more and more ideas for your programmes.
fight, search, find and re-hide :)
And if anything, a developer-seller would be better off dividing his piano program into 10 parts, each product would be unique in its own way and have a better chance of being bought.
Alas, this thread has arisen due to the fact that grail riveting has exceeded all acceptable limits.
You need to publish a couple of your products in the Market and then you will see for yourself
The way you think you need it and the better way - it won't work!
One or two people will buy a piano with a mountain of settings, but you'll blow your brains out like 1,000
It's 1 out of 100 products in the Market, and there's no guarantee that it will be a super piano with a mountain of settings, for which the trader will be responsible.
To Peter.
Vladimir is very right. You should publish a few products yourself, and then no one will kick you for a purely theoretical approach. And you will also understand a lot about what you should and should not write here.
Please put some effort into your products, and then we will all be happy to listen carefully to your opinions here.
Alas, this thread was created because the clawing of grails has exceeded all acceptable limits.
People come to forex for profit, not for beautiful lines and lines on the chart. Consequently, the "profitability" indicator will always be in demand, not 100500 settings.
All this may change only after people will come to forex not for profit, but for fun. In the meantime, there is only "Profitability" and nothing more.