Record on the Market - page 27
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have to admit that my first opinion of the changes in Market policy was wrong. I believed that removing strict moderation was a measure leading to competition and increasing programme complexity. To natural selection. Towards a forced increase in product quality.
But that's how it should ideally be. Reality is full of disappointments.
To rephrase my opinion:
even if there is a real signal, if there is a demo, if there is a demo for real, if there is a month's rent for ridiculous money... even if there is a clause that the Expert Advisor does not work in the strategy tester:
The buyer (90%) needs a tester grail and pretty pictures.
Agreed.
To rephrase my opinion:
even if there is a real signal, if there is a demo, if there is a demo for real, if there is a month's rent for ridiculous money... even if there is a clause that the Expert Advisor does not work in the strategy tester:
The buyer (90%) wants a tester grail and pretty pictures.
I come to the conclusion that Market should have gone the way of developing utilities. Software that supports and expands trading opportunities, but does NOT take responsibility for decision-making. The direction of current EAs should have been bypassed. By any means necessary. Because it is a dead end. It's an endless self-discredit through deceit, deception and frustrating customers.
I am coming to the conclusion that Market should have gone down the path of developing utilities. Software that supports and expands trading opportunities, but does NOT take responsibility for decision-making. The direction of current EAs should have been bypassed. By any means necessary. Because it is a dead end. It is endless self-discredit through deceit, deception and frustration of customers.
I have to admit that my first opinion of the changes in Market policy was wrong. I believed that removing strict moderation was a measure leading to competition and increasing programme complexity. Natural selection. Towards a forced increase in product quality.
Well, no. You have the mistake of people who think that the result of natural selection is man. And in reality it is not. The result of natural selection is also degradation, right down to the simplest.
And it is precisely the changes in the Market that have led to this selection, when the Market is full of junk that no one needs.
The "cure" for this is very simple - the introduction of a small fee for displaying paid products. That is, MetaQuotes should charge not only a percentage of sales, but also a small fixed amount each time. I think even $1 a month per product or signal - would significantly reduce the number of outright shitty products and signals. Shit should only be free.
I am coming to the conclusion that Market should have gone down the path of developing utilities. Software that supports and expands trading opportunities, but does NOT take responsibility for decision-making. The direction of current EAs should have been bypassed. By any means necessary. Because it is a dead end. It is endless self-discredit through deceit, deception and frustration of customers.
I disagree. Just the current advisers are fine. Introduce a fee for putting them up for sale and everything will normalise. If you change the amount of the fee, you will be able to show really attractive products that are of interest to a lot of people.
Well, no. You have the mistake of people who think that the result of natural selection is man. And in reality it is not. The result of natural selection is also degradation, right down to the simplest.
And it is precisely the changes in the Market that have led to this selection, when the Market is full of junk that no one needs.
The "cure" is very simple - the introduction of a small fee for the exhibition of paid products. That is, MetaQuotes should charge not only a percentage of sales but also a small fixed amount each time. I think even $1 per product or signal - would significantly reduce the number of outright shitty products and signals. Shit should only be free.
I think it's a little different
charge 100 for example for registering a proprietor
then the kids who forward the codobase will be eliminated and so will a lot of others
Sorry for the mistakes - I poured beer on my laptop and now the keyboard is lagging
You can't filter out the inadequates with money.
Why? Give me a reason?
Say, the texting fee is quite small, however, it saves you a lot from spam - the proportion of spam SMS messages is much smaller than that of spam e-mails.
I think it's a little different
charge 100 for example for registering a proprietor
Then the schoolboys who ferry kodobaz will be eliminated and so will many others
Sorry about the mistakes - I poured beer on my laptop and now my keyboard is lagging.
Ha! We pay $100, and stamp unlimited kodobase fakes?
No.
It is reasonable to register as a vendor for free. But it is necessary to put up a product for a small fee. As I said above, even $1 a month will greatly reduce the amount of outright rubbish. The specific amount should be estimated based on the content of the Market.