Subscription to OnBookEvent sometimes falls off - is there such a thing? - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You started the argument, you finish it. I have nothing to apologise for. I was making a point, unlike you.
I've seen all your posts. You quoted only what suited you, and what came before that and then you just ignored it as if you hadn't written it at all. Indeed from the een time you managed to reproduce the problem. And anyway, came to this thread with your problem, which has nothing to do with the topic.
The fact that you keep writing characterizes you not in the best way, you just badly spoil your image, and people
people remember it for a long time. The problem has been understood, though, and I should point out, not at your "instigation"!
I won't answer you again (it's just getting ridiculous at the very least)
I understand the problem.
To complete the picture, I am attaching the check codes for OnChartEvent
Attach 1st indicator to the chart... then 2nd indicator. After the 2nd indicator is removed from the chart, the 1st one stops receiving CHARTEVENT_MOUSE_WHEEL events , although it received them properly before
Attach the 1st indicator to the chart... then the 2nd one. After the 2nd indicator is removed from the chart, the 1st one stops getting CHARTEVENT_MOUSE_WHEEL events , although it was receiving them before
Why should it continue receiving them?
It is exactly as described in the help:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/constants/chartconstants/enum_chartevents
Why should he keep getting them?
This is exactly as described in the certificate:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/constants/chartconstants/enum_chartevents
Then OnBookEvent corresponds (why is there a discrepancy with the description?) and the developers can sleep well.
It's just that OnChartEvent has a more detailed description than OnBookEvent
Then the OnBookEvent corresponds and the Developers can sleep peacefully.
I can't comment on OnBookEvent, I'm not in the subject. But about MouseWheel in the help it is clearly written that it is a property of the chart, and it concerns all programs running on this chart.
I can't comment on OnBookEvent, I'm not in the subject. But about MouseWheel in the help, it is clearly written that it is a property of a chart, and it concerns all programs running on this chart.
Furthermore , the developer has formulated the principle: Subscription status of one EA should not affect other EAs.
If the principle is general, it should be the same for OnBookEvent and OnChartEvent
I also noted here that the work of OnChartEvent corresponds to the description
Moreover , the developer has formulated the following principle: the state of one EA's subscription should not affect other EAs.
Subscriptions are subscriptions, but the chart property is a property of the chart.
MOUSE_WHEEL is the same as setting the chart background colour. You can use one indicator, and you can use another one. In this case, when ChartGet(), they will all get the current colour.
Subscriptions are subscriptions, but the graph property is a graph property.
MOUSE_WHEEL is the same as setting the chart background colour. You can use one indicator and you can use another one. At the same time when ChartGet() they will all get the current colour.
Don't get confused. It's
about subscriptions, not about properties
I'm not confused.
Here is this piece of your code
This is the graph property, not the subscription.