Our development path. Councillors of today and tomorrow. - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Even my grandson wouldn't compare a hammer to a councillor. Sorry, but your thinking is too primitive.
Use your figurative thinking. Don't take it literally. "Hammer" is common slang in design and engineering circles. Although, apparently, for you, that environment is too primitive, and you are parIting much higher in your awareness. Funny and sad at the same time...
zy. Apparently, however, it's just not within the scope of your concepts.Engage imaginative thinking. Don't take it literally. "Hammer" is common slang in a design and engineering environment. Although, apparently, for you, this environment is too primitive, and you are higher in your awareness. Funny and sad at the same time...
Who cares?
The hammer will kill you. God forbid of course((
And the Councillor is a deposit. Acceptable))))
Advisor = hammer. И...
In fact, the question of liability is much deeper. Not for nothing does the "Software Usage Rules" all contain a clause about limited liability. Check it out if you haven't read it before.
I can make fun of you. Why didn't they write in the hammer rules about the possibility of serious bodily harm with a hammer.
A hammer is more dangerous to a person than a piece of software to a single person. A piece of software can even be very dangerous to society.
I can make fun of you. Why didn't they write in the hammer rules about the possibility of serious bodily harm with a hammer.
A hammer is more dangerous to humans than a piece of software to one person. A software product can even be a serious danger to society.
I wonder if you think that if a person is considered to be nailed, does that mean that they are nailed? (Or are they nailed themselves :))
I wonder how you think if a person is considered nailed, does that mean they are nailed? (Or are they nailed themselves :)))
Don't think so badly of yourself.
Don't think so badly of yourself.
That's it?... Is that really the limit of your erudition...? I had a different opinion of you...
I can make fun of you. Why didn't they write in the hammer rules about the possibility of causing serious bodily harm with a hammer.
I can make fun of you. Why didn't they write in the hammer rules about the possibility of it causing serious bodily harm.
The hammer is more dangerous to an individual than a software product to a single person.
A software product can even be seriously dangerous to society.
This is a moot point.As this product can cause much more damage to 1 person and in the chain can affect several or many people, and the hammer is an individual component)))
What is the future of EAs? Will they evolve and in what scenario - MO, AI, OS or eternal DOS (figuratively)?
Chatting on the forum, I've made the following conclusions:
From the viewpoint of programmers-traders, trading programs must be a naked logical framework that carries the load of calculations. There is no need to interact with them. You only need to let them move along the track with a steering wheel turned in advance. And off we go. If they are lacking capabilities, they may use "crutches" - Excel, SQL, VS, DLL and so on. So be it. But what if we could get rid of crutches and get everything we need from the terminal itself?
I have always believed that trading programmes should develop into a trading environment with broad capabilities and interact with the user like an intelligent operating system. That they should have risk management, statistics and newsfeed and a custom market and so on. A sort of terminal in a terminal. Dreams of course... What is it for? To make an assembly of your own desires and possibilities. But, what if we take this development path?
The main question is: What content and features to add to the Expert Advisors, if suddenly the content and features become much greater?
I suggest that we use our imagination and imagine the EA architecture of the future.
An advisor should simply earn, not be a 'human friend' to talk to.