You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Maybe we should make a separate thread and call it Company News.
And it would be nice if such things were covered in advance - not as a "knife in the heart".
Yeah, yeah,
- But here, it's like a knife in the back,
- Katerina was taken away,
- and the investigator's got me in charge!
Yes, they will be free.
We are gradually improving the service and there will be more interesting features for subscribers soon.
Thank you so much for removing cent accounts , it was a shame when a 10k lower account was ranked at 1000 cents. I hope now you will bring back 200% -300% growth per month and will not reset them to zero.
Yeah, yeah,
- but here, like a knife in the back,
- Katerina was taken,
- and the investigator's got me in charge!
Thank you so much for removing cent accounts , it was a shame when a 10k account was lower in the 1000 cents account ranking. I hope now you will bring back 200% -300% growth per month and not zero them out.
The rating could have been done separately for standard and cent ones, and everyone would have been satisfied and had a fair choice.
Yeah, cent brokers have a maximum risk of 10 quid, while subscribers have to risk thousands of quid.
As for me, the minimum initial deposit for a provider should be at least 1000 quid, or even more.
And the value of initial deposit should be included into formula for rating calculation.
Yeah, cent brokers have a maximum risk of 10 quid, while subscribers have to risk thousands of quid.
As for me, the minimum initial deposit for a provider should be at least 1000 quid, or even more.
And the value of initial deposit should be included into formula for rating calculation.
Sounds fair.
Yeah, cent brokers have a maximum risk of 10 quid, while subscribers have to risk thousands of quid.
As for me, the minimum initial deposit for a provider should be at least 1000 quid, or even more.
And the value of initial deposit should be added to formula for rating calculation.
Sounds fair enough.
What's worse than a cent account signal that it should be free?
Because (very roughly speaking) instead of one account with a live depo of $1000, you can create 100 accounts with a $10 depo - and frolic, losing 99 accounts, for the sake of bringing one to the top.
Because (very roughly speaking) instead of one account with a live depo of $1000, you can create 100 accounts with a depo of $10 - and frolic, draining 99 accounts, for the sake of bringing one to the top.