You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You got that right. I respect that. It's obvious you've been working on this subject.
You don't need it both ways. You only need one! You have to look at the asymmetry for that. You're not?
Probably...but I still do not quite understand how it works, I need to make a robot as an example and look at it. Entropy is growing ... even asymmetry won't help ...
I've already done everything in VisSim.
If all goes well, I'll post the Grail here, hoping that another altruist like me will translate this junk into MQL.
I'll rip the shit out of the Pindos and the thread will be closed.
I've already done everything in VisSim.
If all goes well, I'll post the Grail here, hoping that another altruist like me will translate this junk into MQL.
We'll rip the shit out of the pindos and the thread will be closed.
I've already done everything in VisSim.
If all goes well, I'll post the Grail here, hoping that another altruist like me will translate this junk into MQL.
I will rip off this stuff and the whole thread will be closed.
If it works as you say, I'll translate it into mql myself.
It's a deal. I will post a trade report here at the end of each week.
I want to move away from Wissim because of the frequent bridge failures between it and MT4 and the limitation of the array of data to be processed. I wrote about it a long time ago. HZ - if I didn't have those problems, and, well, help in discussing specific Grail algorithms, I wouldn't have appeared here at all.
I've come here for help, and here are some alcoholics only...(it certainly doesn't concern programmers). Well, you understand.
The only thing that will really help is interpolation. The only thing that will really help is interpolation. Or you can build a line, in which the price limits itself by recursive calculations. Any algorithm based on foreign absolute variables produces a floating error or lag.
Chehevara, I do not use extraneous variables. I just look at the chart.
What will it give - it is the third, because I agree that nothing.
In this case, the first and the second are just a sporting interest, to spend my weekends ;).
I'm still 100% sure that chart analysis (future price prediction, signal, etc.) in any interpretation is not the way to success.
You seriously don't know how to apply it? It's the Grail, if you really know on-line. You take any trend strategy, even on the wave/parabolic, and trade it only in trends. Or a flat, oscillators or something in fluxes, or both of them alternately, so as not to sit idle.
Chegevar, I don't use extraneous variables. I'm just making a graph.
What I get is the third thing, because I agree that it's nothing.
The first and the second are of interest for sport in order to spend weekends ;).
I'm still 100% sure that the chart analysis (future price forecast, signal, etc.) is not the way to success, by any interpretation.
Martin Cheguevara:
Нее а например ордерные системы. У меня сигнал это просто повышение вероятности попадания на участок ликвидного рынка но сама ордерная система вытаскивает убытки в Профит при любом раскладе ибо торгует как по тренды так и в коррекцию одновременно.на одном сигнале далеко не уедешь:₽ это уж точно:)
Sometimes the risks exceed the dangerous limits, that's when trading with eyes and hands starts, i.e. placing robot in the right places and removing its work in time. I.e. manual placing of robots and this is the most important part of trading
the profits there are less than the interest in the bank
If the robot's algorithm isn't finished, I understand what the second part of the post is about
There's less profit than the interest in the bank.
if the robot's algorithm isn't finished, i see what the second part of the post is about