From theory to practice - page 285
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You should first find out what a Gaussian Markov process is, for example, so you don't write such bloopers about non-Markovianity)
The distribution of price gains is exponential bilaterally, with tails. What has Gaussian got to do with it at all?
Forex has a memory, it is possible to predict prices. The process is non-Markovian, obviously.
The distribution of price gains is exponential bilaterally, with tails. What does Gaussian have to do with it anyway?
Forex has memory, price prediction is possible. The process is non-Markovian, obviously.
I had an interesting candlestick with my own orders on the real account
I could see everything there, both the formation and closing of the candle, the exit price and the closing price calculation, and the closing price was just the same, sorry I can't show it, my hard drive with the screenshot fried...
there's a memory, e-e-e-e!The distribution of price gains is exponential bilaterally, with tails. What has Gaussian got to do with it at all?
Forex has memory, price prediction is possible. The process is non-Markovian, obviously.
Oh shit, you're not even reading through a line but through 5 posts, apparently.
Renat Akhtyamov:The distribution of increments is normal, as expected.
That's it, the processis non-Markovian, that's what needs to be proven !!!!
Fuck, you don't even read a line through but five posts later, apparently.
Renat Akhtyamov:The distribution of the increments is normal, as expected.
All right, it's anon-Markovian process, that's what I needed to prove !!!
Maxim, I don't just read books and trade relentlessly....
You scratch your tongue relentlessly.
He then corrected the error, and the normal one was gone.
No, that's what the picture was, just a solid line, not a bar graph.
and the phrase itself wasn't confusing either?
You scratch your tongue relentlessly.
and you scratch, that's what this forum is all about.
and, hey, stop being so hard on yourself.
No, that's what the picture was, just a solid line, not a bar graph.
and you weren't confused by the phrase either?
Here's a picture with a line -https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page282#comment_6959358
He wrote himself that he found the error and the normal distribution is no longer available in the indicator -https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page283#comment_6959388
and you're scratching, that's what this forum is all about.
and hey, don't be a bully
Oh, that's enough of that.
i've been hanging out with too many bollinger grailers:)