From theory to practice - page 1558
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Honestly - I'm sick of this forum. There was a specific question - how to determine if there is a giant outlier, by what criteria. If the only criterion is OI, how to get it into the terminal, or how to calculate it.
The answer to this question was a lot of Vysotsky's waffling, high philosophy with accusations of my signals and just plain stupidity.
What is there to talk about?
Anatoly - this is not specifically addressed to you, but simply a reasoning about the pointlessness of all endeavours on the forum.
The main point is that discord is not predicted in the future, but sought in the recent past.
Honestly - I'm sick of this forum. There was a specific question - how to determine if there is a gigantic outburst, by what criteria. If the only criterion is OI, how to get it into the terminal, or how to calculate it.
The answer to this question was a lot of Vysotsky's waffling, high philosophy with accusations of my signals and just plain stupidity.
What is there to talk about?
Anatoly - this is not specifically addressed to you, but simply a reasoning about the pointlessness of all endeavours on the forum.
The forum helps to find like-minded people and occasionally helps me discover something new. So maybe a dynamic timeframe reference point will not necessarily be a Zig-Zag. You can take another signal indicator and make bars based on its signals.
Implement the above, there are a lot of timeframes already tried.
And judging by the way Sasha is tearing his W shirt, Lambert is also off the mark.
Implement the above, there are a lot of timeframes already tried.
And judging by the way Sasha is tearing his W shirt, Lambert is also off the mark.
Exactly. That's where illusion trading comes in... On a transformed chart - almost 100% of trades are in profit, but on real data - so-so...
There was a specific question - how to determine if there is a giant emission, by what criteria.
As usual, with the help of MO. We learn to predict abnormal spikes in volatility, of course we cannot predict spikes related to socio-political events like Brexit and some war, but "planned" spikes can be a couple of % more accurate than random.
The answer is simply stupidity.
By the time you find it out using statistical methods, it will be too late) The best breakdown - stoploss, or breakdown.
I have already written to him, he is looking for meaning in a certain hypostasis, then with a bias towards everything he remembers from high school, then Gann, then Witches, then the Almighty trying to call him to account.
HH: I like to solve all problems by searching for analogies in the physical world - so I read the TV forum, more and more convinced that the search for a mathematical formulaE the market is like searching for a way to guess the next card in a pack of cards in a card game..... but without knowing what the next card in the deck one can often beat the opponent, right? ;)