From theory to practice - page 1432

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

exactly

the advisor went to be tested against its real trade, which went into the historical data

stop him and check again on the section where he didn't trade in real

the result will be different.

before it went into the general pile in real so to speak - the result should probably be the same...

 
Сергей Криушин:

before he got into the general pile for real so to speak - the result should probably be the same...

I don't think my owl trades like everyone else)

Files:
gi0uks3.JPG  109 kb
 
Сергей Криушин:

before he got into the general pile in real so to speak - the result should probably be the same...

fact
 
EgorKim:

I don't think my owl trades like everyone else)

Cool to get a head start - then what's the problem and where is it pouring in?

 
Сергей Криушин:

it's a cool thing to do - so what's the problem and where it's pouring out?

and you can see it on the stack.

At the beginning, the acceleration, the volume is high.

It means that the risk is high.

You can't do that with this strategy, the market will pay attention to it and will not let you trade on the plus side

---

my advice is to limit the risk to a reasonable limit
 
Сергей Криушин:

Cool is winding up - then what is the problem and where is it pouring in?

I think the problem is that the market is chaos and the market has no memory.

The only method they try to manipulate the market is news.

But only those who present this news to the crowd and publish it make money.

No matter how, television, the media, reporting, advertising, etc. - that's how they drum into the brains of most people where to go.

But even here, there is nothing for the common man to do.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

and you can see from the stats.

at the beginning-- overclocking, high volume.

It means the risk is high.

I don't think so, the market will pay attention to him and he will not trade on the plus side

---

my advice is to limit the risk

In my opinion there is no connection, i managed to get into the swing, but i got a problem to hold it, though nothing prevents, but swamp is sucking us in - the number of mistakes is growing anyway...

 
Сергей Криушин:

In my opinion there is no connection, I have often managed to get into the stream, but to hold on to it is a problem, although nothing seems to interfere, but the swamp is sucking in - the number of errors is still increasing...

going with the flow, it's too late, that's the problem.

you have to learn how to identify the pivot point

which almost all indicators lose because they lag...

Matemat was here, his almost last words on the forum were about the same thing

But he's a mathematician...

I personally didn't believe him at first that he hadn't found

And then I saw for myself that maths was not the answer
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

in the stream, downstream - it's too late, that's the problem.

you have to learn how to spot the turning point

a U-turn is the problem... - except roughly, but the momentum is always there, so getting on it and riding it is the best thing...))

mathematically means also approximately - never mind, there can be no precision in this business...
 
Сергей Криушин:

a U-turn is the problem... - except roughly, but the traffic is always there, so getting on it and driving around is the best thing...))

such....

a dime a dozen.

Look at the open positions and at a ratio of at least 40/60 or vice versa, ride against the crowd for two or three months, at least.

it's a working and profitable system.

again the nuance will come in - when to reverse? (turn around or not already?)

the general is still fanning, which is aimed at catching this very reversal

will turn around and come out to the forum