From theory to practice - page 1720
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, you wouldn't.
If you set yourself the goal of quitting the casino either when you double your capital or when you lose all your capital,
you'll win 50%, you'll lose 50%.
(for the case of a perfect roulette wheel, no zeros)
As you can see, it's 50/50. It's just like the theorist for sb.
We are talking about a theoretical possibility. With an infinite deposit, it is possible.
However, the market is not SB and the impossibility of applying martingale on it has not been proven by anyone. Can you apply a martin to a sine wave? Or to the Weierstrass function? I suppose so.
If Che finds some regularities in the market BP and uses a martin, why not? I don't get it...
PS I don't really care about martingale. But, for the sake of principle, I would not exclude it from possible tools for working with the market.
PS I am attaching my library which I used in the creation of my TS.
Shelepin(s) - complete nonsense
Orlov - some sense, only confused by the comparison of histograms built on overlapping samples.
Both Gmurman and you made the same amount of profit on forex
woof
Do you even believe in the Grail?
Strange that with a good level of education, you obviously don't have it... All knowledge gone to hell, all down the drain...
You must believe in Him with all your heart and soul.
Amen.
Well, I don't know...
Theoretically, martingale is one possible way to shoehorn SB. Whether market BP is exactly SB is debatable. To answer it, you need to have an understanding - is the sequence of price increments independent random variables? Here it is not so simple. In some areas it is, in some areas it is not. The market is a hellish mixture of random and non-random sequences.
Martingale is dangerous on the purest SB. And on impure?! That question has never been investigated by anyone.
So if Che spreads some nets in heavy tails of market distributions and it gives results, then why not!!! Practice is the criterion of truth.
theoretically...
practically - if one pair is eating, then the same loss will be on the other
that's why i went back to arbitrage and don't buzz....
If only one pair is traded, a martin can avoid the luck of the draw for a while, and at the same time it can cut the profits furiously.
;)
Do you even believe in the Grail?
Strange that with a good level of education, you obviously don't have it... All knowledge gone to hell, all down the drain...
You must believe in Him with all your heart and soul.
Amen.
It is not enough to "believe", you must know exactly WHAT and HOW to do to do it
Do you even believe in the Grail?
Strange that with a good level of education, you obviously don't have it... All knowledge gone to hell, all down the drain...
You must believe in Him with all your heart and soul.
Amen.
You see, Shurik, the grail is a lot of money and therefore many temptations. Expensive things, food, drink and other bad luxuries can harm not only the trader's health but also his immortal soul! The trader is weak and attracted to all this, but merciful owners of various retail Forex structures help him to overcome it! At the same time, all they get from traders is scolding and not a word of thanks! Even the metaquotes are involved in this good cause by making, for example, a buggy statistics library and an incomprehensible calendar api.
Judging by your methods, your system takes an unlikely but still possible trend as an extremum. And this is fundamentally wrong.
You'll simply lose on a strong crisis or simply on a strong move or you'll simply lose potential profits on the lows of a drift upwards or the highs of a drift downwards as it's happening in your case now.
The system should initially be dynamic in order to identify the SB drift as well as for finding static fluctuations.
You are right, Comrade Che!!! I agree by 100 grams))))
Shurik has not yet been convinced enough of his wrongness. But notes sometimes already slip that the Tuzik tear the heating pad teeth are still a bit weak.
You see, Shurik, the grail is a lot of money and thus many temptations. Expensive things, food, drink and other unwholesome excesses can harm not only a trader's health, but also his immortal soul! The trader is weak and attracted to all this, but merciful owners of various retail Forex structures help him to overcome it! At the same time, all they get from traders is scolding and not a word of thanks! Even metaquotes are involved in this good cause by making, for example, a buggy statistics library and an incomprehensible calendar api.
grail is music among other things
Well, obviously - the whole deposit in case the market is SB.
But, after all, the classic case uses a martingale when entering a trade at any point in time. And Comrade Che only enters a trade when the price is in a heavy tail (maybe I don't understand his strategy exactly, but essentially correct). Probably because of this and the fact that price is not really SB, he has a great result.
ehhh...theorists
Only irrecoverable losses - spread and swap - are retained in the martin. And only from a loss.
then everything becomes even and almost all strategies start working