From theory to practice - page 1024
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Speed has nothing to do with it... There's nothing wrong with it.
Once again - bravo!
The post completely coincides with my view of the market.
Once again - bravo!
The post is completely in line with my view of the market.
Once again - bravo!
The post is fully consistent with my view of the market.
Have you noticed that for a long time I've been blathering on about the same thing. I do it for a reason)
Why do you litter all the threads with it?
Out of desperation?
Why do you litter all the threads with it?
Out of desperation?
The question is for whom is the market random, for the observer? Or is the market random to itself? Just like that - the price happens here, and then the price happens there, and then it happens again wherever it wants... Or does the price represent the final result of something happening?
If you look at the way cars move when approaching an intersection, it may seem random to the observer that they follow, but it is not a fact that the driver changed his mind and went the wrong way.
The question is for whom is the market random, for the observer? Or is the market random to itself? Just like that - the price happens here, and then the price happens there, and then it happens again wherever it wants... Or does the price represent the final result of something?
If you look at the way cars move when approaching an intersection, it may appear to the observer that their subsequent movements are random, but it is not a fact that the driver changed his mind and drove in the wrong direction.
What's the observer got to do with it? Accidental in itself, and the observer is dumb. The outcome of this manipulation is predictable
I've been through more than one generation of traders and played requiem on them.
as some physicist would say... if you put the eye at a certain distance from the market, it will not change its properties, as it was before the observer, so it remains
i mean a time series of quotes, not the market itself... though that doesn't make it any easier
I've been following this thread for four months now and I'm wondering if anyone has a bright idea on the horizon... Judging by the posts, at this rate, it may appear in about two years... Alexander, don't give up. Try to think by the principle of razors Occam's principle will help you a lot).
Sickle in the balls? Also an option, one less problem.
what does it have to do with the observer? the observer is dumb. the outcome of this manipulation is predictable.
I've lived through more than one generation of Traduns and played requiem on them.
as some physicist would say... if you put the eye at a certain distance from the market, it will not change its properties, as it was before the observer, so it remains
I'm talking about the time series of quotes, not the market itself... although that doesn't make it any easier
You've already got everything completely confused in your head from despair.
The measure of the randomness of a process is a function of the particular predictive model.
One process can be predicted by a model with R^2=0.82 and another with R^2=0.42.
So how random is the process?
You've already got it all mixed up in your head.
The measure of process randomness is a function of the particular predictive model.
One process can be predicted by a model with R^2=0.82 and another with R^2=0.42.
So how random is this process?
with a larger sample, it's random, 50/50.
I don't have anything confused in my head. It is possible to earn, but as the horizon increases, profits will fall proportionally and tend to zero
proven by Nobel
What's r^2 got to do with it, what are you talking about?