You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why? 100-150% a year, or even half a year-8 months...
I thought it was 300, and that's with a 100% risk.
But what about the -$20 "hanging" on the max-equity and what to do? If I don't increase risks while my lot is the same and minimal, how else would I cover the -$20?
That's fine.
For a long time in almost all the branches I have been writing about the first question - to work with drawdown, the third one - to determine approximately the direction of the entrance.
Of course, you are solving this problem wrong, judging by the content of your post. Don't ask for a hint, I won't give one anyway.
Well, increasing the lot is not an option... I know all variants to solve this problem.
strangely enough, but only one works.
The rest greatly reduces the profit.
Breakeven does not always work)
and a break-even is nothing but a waste of time.
Why, a breakeven is also any profitable trade, not just a simple refund of the spread
Why, a breakeven is also any profitable trade, not just a simple refund of the spread
А . I see ... of course I don't know how you solved the problem of leveling losses, but if you did and the solution is stable then that's really cool!)
yes, I remember
you already wrote about it above
kish mish, break it down, at least mathematically solve the problem... from the end, so to speak.in this context I agree
and therefore striving (in the end) to break-even is a very honourable task - almost like reaching the maximum possible profit!
and therefore striving (in the end) to break-even is a very honourable task - almost like striving for the highest possible profit!
What difference does it make - the process is one and indissoluble! Approaches may be different, but it is a matter of what one is good at or how one can do it...