From theory to practice - page 574
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
and I can. But I don't want to. ))))
I don't want to break the laws of nature. It's easier to live this way.
I don't want to break the laws of nature. It's easier to live that way.
If I broke it, I'd get a Nobel Prize. If I got famous, I'd quit the forex business. All it takes is one time.
If I broke it, they'd give me a Nobel Prize. If he'd become famous, he'd quit the Forex business.
Not everything is measured by Nobel Prizes. Everyone has only one life and is measured in one, at the most, hundred years.
Not everything is measured by Nobel Prizes. Everyone has only one life and is measured in one, at the most, hundred years.
And some people dream, well, just rave about Nobel Prizes. Look at the beginning of the topic, there our scientist, A_K, was already preparing suitcases for money.
And some people dream, well, just rave about Nobel Prizes. Look at the beginning of the thread, A_K was already preparing suitcases for the money.
They are so exhausted by science that a sandwich is a treat for them, and a Nobel is lunch and dinner in retirement.
And some people dream, well, they just rave about Nobel Prizes. Look at the beginning of the thread, A_K was already preparing suitcases for money.
:)))
I'm into anomalous diffusion now... If anyone has any literature - post it.
Especially interested in formulas to calculate diffusion coefficient (dispersion).
For example, I tried to use "cube root of T" proportion instead of "root of T" proportion, results on historical tests are better.
:)))
I'm into anomalous diffusion now... If anyone has any literature, post it.
Especially interested in formulas to calculate diffusion coefficient (dispersion).
For example, I tried using the proportion "cube root of T" instead of the proportion "cube root of T", the results on historical tests are better.
You'd be better off looking at the price. Sorry I couldn't resist.
:)))
I'm into abnormal diffusion now...
It's not working.
It doesn't work.
I'm against it. We'll have to see about that. Interesting ideas are never ignored.
It doesn't.
Well, it reads interestingly.