You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Took the data from herehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86386/page836#comment_7062634
I decided to see the distribution inside the sliding window, i.e. in 10000, took (Bid+Ask)/2, then *100000 to make it a whole number, counted the increments and what I got, when I saw it, I laughed until I cried )))) Maybe a mistake somewhere, I attach a picture:
Took the data from herehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86386/page836#comment_7062634
I decided to see the distribution inside the sliding window, i.e. in 10000, took (Bid+Ask)/2, then *100000 to make it a whole number, counted the increments and what I got, when I saw it, I laughed until I cried )))) I may be mistaken somewhere, I attach a picture:
Nah, that's right - the sharp peak at zero is a pseudo-quote. The task was just to move to such an Erlang flow so that these pseudo-quotes would not be there and it is there that the purest Laplace "sits". But, only - what to do with it? The question is open.
Took the data from herehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/86386/page836#comment_7062634
I decided to see the distribution inside the sliding window, i.e. in 10000, took (Bid+Ask)/2, then *100000 to make it a whole number, counted the increments and what I got, when I saw it, I laughed until I cried )))) Maybe there is a mistake somewhere, I attach a picture:
what you described, right:
(0,99067+0,99263) * 50000 = 99165
how do you calculate the gradients?
in the table bid and ask next to each other, enter in the same file the formula for the difference between them and in half, the picture will become clear
Next I suggest:
Take something elementary.
like a circle, calculate the increments.
or a sine wave, so the sorcerer doesn't freak out.
maybe enlighten from which line and how the increments should be counted in terms of understanding where the pre...Thank you, Honey)))
I hope you're not Renate?
Maybe it would be better to calculate the increments from which line and how it is better to calculate them...
The increments are best counted from the opening level of the position.
I meant not from the current price, but from some MA-point, for example.
Otherwise - their system fails, they don't see a trend, for Christ's sake
They need a confirmation to enter, they don't have it.
Most likely, they'll start catching rebounds in a downtrend and pullbacks in an uptrend, excluding the rest
the exceptions will become take profit and the re-signal will become a stop
Then maybe something useful will come out, since the predicted take/stop ratio is clearly much higher than unityIt's best to count increments from the opening level.
Uh-oh! That's the deal.
profit to catch in pips, what's the point?
The order's already open...
switch the profit in the terminal from money to pips, it is already calculated and availableThe best way to count increments is from the opening level of the position.
I wrote this to them about 200 pages ago) but it will come in 5 years)