From theory to practice - page 550

New comment
 
Alexander_K:

This demolition as a measure of central tendency is the crux of the matter.

I'm sick of your demolition. There is no demolition. There is a heterogeneous environment.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
Fuck off with your demolition. There is no demolition. There is a heterogeneous environment.

What do you mean, no roof?))

 

In my opinion, the non-lagging thing to build a channel around is the midpoint of the spread: (High+Low)/2

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
Fuck off with your demolition. There is no demolition. There's a heterogeneous environment.

Go sleep it off, pops.

 
Alexander_K:

In my opinion, the non-lagging thing to build a channel around is the midpoint of the spread: (High+Low)/2

I suspect there is no no lag.

 
Alexander_K:

Go sleep it off, pops.

Advice after a year of pointless and relentless work.))
I'll be sober in the morning and you'll stay sober. (с) )))
 

By the way, I'm telling you again - I've stopped the crazy grail chase and don't give me any of that heterogeneous environment crap.

Write for people - simple, clear and ingenious.

And maybe in a month or two I'll write something for my soul, quietly.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:

I suspect there is no lag.

High i Low, although formed non-linear in time, have the same distribution as Close, and we will only know by the close of the candle, so there is a lag.
 
Novaja:
Although High i Low are formed non-linearly in time, they have the same distribution as Close, and we know it only at closing of a candle, so we have a time lag.

Hmmm... What if we take the current Min/Max of a ticking moving array?

 
Alexander_K:

And maybe in a month or two I'll make something for my soul, quietly.

It's not a new song, either.)
1...543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557...1981
New comment