From theory to practice - page 228
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And how did you check?
just if(OrderSend) Tho... if not send, then another.
just if(OrderSend) Tho... if not send then another
So it's not catchable...
what can't you catch? OrderSend returns the result of the transaction.
what can't you catch? OrderSend returns the result of the transaction
we're talking about parallel threads of ticks processing, not OrderSend
in mt4 there is one thread
I don't get it) if there are several charts, share by magics or flags via global
in mt4 one thread
That's what I thought too...
If you mean several bots on different charts of the 1st symbol, then yes, the bots need to communicate if only 1 trade is needed
But it's all unimportant, as Alexander doesn't even have a backtest anyway, it's not even interesting to discuss trivial stuff :) without covering the main thing
If you mean several bots on different charts of the 1st symbol, then yes, the bots need to communicate if only 1 trade is needed
there are no such brokers in forex, tens of milliseconds minimum, 200 on average, with zero pings
You can make such a confident statement only after you have tried all types of accounts at all 300 brokers. I'm writing what I've tested and measured personally. And not on cent accounts in gbofoerx-like docs.
No, it just stupidly starts processing the next tick while the old one is still in progress for one bot on the chart....
I've never had a problem with it personally and I've scalped a lot.