From theory to practice - page 186
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's always like this.- We were first in line and those behind us were already eating. (c)
P.S.
The grail will never break if everyone knows about it. The markets just "don't know" how to move differently. And they will never "learn" to. I downloaded the chart from Punk's time into the terminal and it is the same, nothing has changed over the century. Computers, technology on the stock exchange, the availability of information, the composition of participants and instruments, etc. etc. - are different.
Everything is different. But the relationships (interaction) and the result in the form of a chart have not changed a bit. It is a long story why it is so. In the book here's a little bit about it.
http://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/sinergetika/haken_tainy_prirody_sinergetika_nauka_o_vzaimodeistvii/55-1-0-1206
It's always like this.- We were first in line and those behind us were already eating. (c)
p.s.
The grail will never break if everyone knows about it. The markets just "can't" move any other way. It's a long story why this is the case.
The real marketgrail (Forex is not a market) will be instantly broken, if not everyone knows (uses) it, but many, and not even very many. "It's a long story why it's so." (с)
But even if the Grail is found for Forex, it will be immediately used on the real market. And the end of the Grail in Forex).
The grail in the real market (forex is not a market) will break instantly if not everyone knows (uses) about it, but many, and not even very many. "It's a long story why this is so." (с)
But even if the Grail is found for Forex, it will be immediately used on the real market. And the end of the Grail in Forex).
Yes! There is always room for improvement in a good TC
Not always. I've already given the example of a good system of mine which, 3 years after it was taken off the market, basically refused to work when I tried to restore it.
At the same time, it was still in working order.
I remembered that such experiment was conducted twice, with different systems and similar results.
Not always. I've already given the example of a good system of mine which, 3 years after it was taken off the market, basically refused to work when I tried to restore it.
At the same time, it was still in working order.
Zy Recall that such an experiment was even conducted twice, with different systems and similar results.
That's why AI is a universal tool that worked in the past, works in the present and will work in the future, unlike rigid algorithms and notorious rules.....
That is why AI is a versatile tool that has worked in the past, works in the present and will work in the future, unlike rigid algorithms and proverbial rules.....
What is AI as you define it? Are you already working with it?
What is AI? Are you already working with it?
Yuri, are you kidding me?
It's just that the question "with it" means you're aware of it.
Yuri, you've got to be kidding me.
It's just that the question "with him" means you're aware
Quite seriously. But the question is for the author of the post. Clarified, by the way.
Alexander, which is better for your strategy - trend or flat?
At, either a flat or a trend can trade well, but not both.
How do you feel about it?
Yuri, are you kidding me?
It's just that the question "with him" means you're knowledgeable.
Anything new to tell?