You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm afraid to imagine an MQL project that would require several programmers. Unless it's some kind of sophisticated neural networks.
Look at freelancing. If it's not counting wagons, it's a grid, if it's not a grid, add timed trading.
Of course, there will always be those who do not need to delve into market processes and a picture of the tester after optimisation is enough. However, this does not suit professional traders. Therefore, professionals trade either manually or on semi-automatic machines.
Look at Gerchik. He is a professional and he openly said that modern trading robots cannot use his strategy in a good way. That said, he only uses robots as helpers. That is, he shifts the routine work to them - filtering instruments and so on...
The advantages of semi-automatic robots with GUI can be the following:
1. Conducting your own market research and outputting the required data into your own tables.
2. Outputting statistics of your own trading in real time.
3. Manually adjusting trading settings when market indicators change.
4. Quick reconfiguration of the strategy.
5. Total complication of the Expert Advisor, to solve any trader's tasks.
All this will increase the level of algotrading in general.
Therefore, I am in favour of semi-automatic).
All the same, judging from the global scale, is there any chance of success with such a project? After all, if there are companies where programmers are already doing joint development in MQL on other platforms, wouldn't it be easier and more convenient to work in the native environment? What if it would be a big step forward for the company?
We need to see it first, the services have been promising it for a year and a half.
For interest, can I have links to companies that write on mcl?
No, it's personal connections on Skype. You won't have a job there anyway.
We have already made projects in the editor, and the editor itself has been tightened up in terms of features.
We are now concentrating on expanding the editor's functionality:
Projects will give a boost to more complex projects, as opposed to the childish period of "one-file software".
And a collaborative feature with publishing invitations will accelerate this process.
We have already made projects in the editor, and the editor itself has been tightened up in terms of features.
We are now concentrating on expanding the editor's functionality:
Projects will give a boost to more complex projects, as opposed to the childish period of "one-file software".
And a collaborative feature with publishing invitations will accelerate this process.
Where can I read how to use projects in the editor?
We have already made projects in the editor, and the editor itself has been tightened up in terms of features.
We are now concentrating on expanding the editor's functionality:
Projects will give a boost to more complex projects, as opposed to the childish period of "one file program".
And the collaborative feature with publishing invitations will accelerate this process.
Perfect!)
We have already made projects in the editor, and the editor itself has been tightened up in terms of features.
...
Projects will give an impetus to the development of more complex projects, as opposed to the childish period of "one file programme".
By the way, yes, I'd like to read about working with projects.
Where can I read how to use projects in the editor?
By the way, yes, I would like to read about working with projects.
So far there is this help:Projects - MetaEditor