You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Getting back to the topic of the thread. The results of the survey "What platform do you use? " were published an hour or two ago http://ru.forexmagnates.com/rezultatyi-oprosa-kakoy-platformoy-vyi-polzuetes/:
"So, according to the voting results, the platform MetaTrader 4 from the trading software provider MetaQuotes wins with a significant advantage, the preference of 63% of the participants. The flagship product of the same provider, MetaTrader 5, received 19% of votes. At the same time, 21% of those who voted use "other" trading platforms, not listed in the list."
Maybe you don't know what 'fast' means?
Does your solution work well? If it's good, it's great.
How about hundreds of tools - won't there be an overlay?
As I said right away "it's not a masterpiece", it's just a self-taught effort at learning OOP. But it works without any glitches. Before this one, my mql4-program worked well in mql5, but it didn't work properly. I've got a topic somewhere - I've been having a long high-level discussion with a drummer...
Perhaps you will have to add another variant to the function for hundreds of instruments, but the name will remain the same. And this is, in my opinion, the most pleasant plus in OOP. If you master OOP deeper, you might find even more pleasant advantages but... not in my lifetime...
I think I do know though))
All the same, you've proven that you don't know.
Still, you have proven that you don't know.
You have no idea what idiocy you have demonstrated, it's just a complete abnormality. But I won't show you exactly where, because you all aren't interested in my opinion)))
Anyone is interested in an opinion only with valid arguments.
The argument, "you have to do it because I do it" does not interest anyone.
In this particular case, the variable names don't correspond to what is accepted is a weak argument. This was not written for CodeBase.
It's funny how you all sit on the poker on the cross here. Keep sitting down, it makes the world around you funnier.
It's funny how you all sit on the poker on the cross here. Keep sitting down, it makes the world around you funnier.
Well done, Dimitri!
If Peter is a master at fanning fires, then you are a master at putting them out ))))
So far even MOFT doesn't support MT5, which is frustrating for me as I've been chipping away at the spreads there. And what does support mean? Release of new versions? Well if no critical bugs are found, maybe there won't be any new ones.
I have partially switched to MT5, but as Dmitiry rightly pointed out, conditions are better on MT4 for now.
It's not. The speed and quality oforder execution in MT5 create a nice environment to get used to the better (there are sane, and, in fact, very low spreads during the liquidity periods, the example is the same Robo(MT5)). Which in turn gives advantages to the order limit at certain liquidity levels. /*<= and this can more than compensate for the overhead (spread and commission if the account has a commission).
From examples of this /*the green arrows are the limit levels that I set, and the red to blue arrows are how the actual order worked out*/:
This variant of the function has no New_bar() function at all;
This is the most resource-saving option I've provided. In addition, it has another advantage: The new bar event is saved all the time the user code is executed on a timer or tick event.
Previously, you could only get this event once and the flag was cleared with New_bar(). The special function now clears the "event_new_bar[][]" array once a minute and is called only after the execution of custom code.
Custom functions can directly access the array and retrieve new bar event information all the time the code is executed on a timer or tick event.
Resources are saved even more.